Skip to main content

Security report for parataxis.io

Parataxis Capital Management LLC · Finance · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Parataxis Capital Management LLC is a specialized multi-strategy investment advisory firm focused on the digital asset sector. Founded in 2019, it serves institutional allocators, family offices, RIAs, and high-net worth individuals by providing risk-managed and uncorrelated exposure to digital assets. The firm emphasizes disciplined risk management and leverages deep experience in both traditional financial markets and digital assets. Technically, the website is built on Webflow with modern front-end technologies including GSAP for animations and uses Google Fonts and CDN services for performance optimization. The site is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and provides a professional user experience. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data but lacks explicit security headers and published privacy or cookie policies, which are areas for improvement. Overall, the domain registration data is privacy protected but consistent with a legitimate business. The website presents a trustworthy and professional image with minimal user tracking and no advertising. Strategic recommendations include publishing privacy and cookie policies, adding security headers, and establishing incident response contact information to enhance compliance and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: LinkedIn, Cloudflare, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching parataxis.io

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
60
Email security
60
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Parataxis Capital occupies a niche in the finance sector focusing on digital assets, a rapidly growing market. Its competitive advantage lies in combining traditional finance expertise with digital asset native experience, enabling unique risk-managed investment solutions. The business model centers on multi-strategy advisory services targeting sophisticated investors seeking diversification and risk management in digital assets. The firm’s status as a Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business may provide additional credibility and access to certain institutional investors. The website’s lack of extensive marketing or tracking tools suggests a focus on direct investor relationships rather than broad consumer marketing. The company’s physical presence in New York City aligns with its financial services positioning. No partnerships or subsidiaries are publicly disclosed on the site.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data leaks. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces its defense-in-depth posture. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The lack of privacy and cookie policies also indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. The minimal use of third-party scripts reduces attack surface but ongoing monitoring is recommended. Overall, the security posture is adequate for informational purposes but should be enhanced to meet best practices for financial advisory firms.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Establish and publicly disclose an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure process.
  4. Add contact channels specifically for security and abuse reporting (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email).
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Parataxis Capital Management LLC
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Parataxis Capital Management LLC
Description
Parataxis Capital Management LLC (“Parataxis Capital”) is a multi-strategy investment advisory firm focused on the digital asset sector. Founded in 2019, the firm is comprised of a professional investment team with deep experience across traditional financial markets, digital assets and disciplined risk management. They partner with institutional allocators, family offices, RIAs and high-net worth individuals to provide uncorrelated, risk-managed exposure to the digital asset ecosystem. Parataxis Capital is a Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business.
Key services
multi-strategy investment advisory, digital asset exposure, risk-managed investment solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Fonts, GSAP (GreenSock Animation Platform), jQuery 3.5.1, Finsweet Attributes Modal and A11y, SplitType.js, CDNJS
Frameworks
Webflow CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is provided with professional emails and physical address.
  4. No phone numbers explicitly labeled as company contact found.
  5. No security or incident response policies published.
  6. Modern and professional design with good technical implementation.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating minimal user tracking.
  8. WHOIS data is privacy protected or unavailable, common for financial firms.
  9. No advertising or marketing tools detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging modern front-end technologies including GSAP for animations and jQuery for DOM manipulation. It uses Google Fonts for typography and is hosted on Webflow’s CDN, ensuring fast load times and good performance. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and basic accessibility features such as focus outlines for keyboard navigation. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No analytics or tracking services were detected, indicating a privacy-conscious approach. The technical implementation is modern and well-executed, with opportunities to enhance security configurations and privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with parataxis.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review parataxis.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.