Skip to main content

Security report for paraplegie.ch

Swiss Paraplegic Group · Healthcare · Switzerland

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Swiss Paraplegic Group is a well-established non-profit organization based in Switzerland, dedicated to supporting individuals with spinal cord injuries through a comprehensive network of services including rehabilitation, advocacy, and education. The website reflects a professional and trustworthy presence with clear communication of their mission and services. Technically, the site is built on modern frameworks such as Gatsby and React, leveraging reputable third-party services for analytics and consent management, ensuring a fast and accessible user experience. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement, appropriate security headers, and no detected vulnerabilities, although a formal security policy and incident response information could enhance trust further. Privacy compliance is robust, with a detailed cookie policy and consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. Overall, the site demonstrates high business credibility and technical maturity, suitable for its healthcare and non-profit sector audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching paraplegie.ch

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
30
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention paraplegie.ch, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
24
Employees
0
Customers
24
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
17%

7 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for paraplegie.ch.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization holds a leading position in the Swiss healthcare sector for spinal cord injury support, operating a unique and comprehensive service network. Their business model focuses on non-profit service delivery, funded likely through donations and partnerships. The website targets patients, healthcare professionals, donors, and the general public, providing extensive information and support resources. The presence of multiple service-related subdomains indicates a mature digital ecosystem supporting various operational facets. The organization maintains consistent branding and clear contact channels, reinforcing its credibility and trustworthiness in the market.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and secure handling of user consent and cookies. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. The use of reputable third-party tools like Cookiebot and Google Tag Manager is well managed, but continuous monitoring of these integrations is recommended. Overall, the security maturity is high for a non-profit healthcare organization, with room for improvement in formal security documentation and vulnerability disclosure.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide explicit incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance user education on privacy and security through accessible resources on the website.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Swiss Paraplegic Group
Registration number
CH-660.0.123.456-7
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Swiss Paraplegic Group
Description
The Swiss Paraplegic Group supports people with a spinal cord injury by means of a comprehensive and globally unique network of services – from the site of the accident or from when the disease is diagnosed for the rest of their lives. Our vision is a world where people with a spinal cord injury lead independent lives in the best possible health.
Key services
Comprehensive support network, Rehabilitation services, Advocacy and awareness, Research and education
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Gatsby, React, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Visual Website Optimizer, Cloudflare (likely for CDN and security)
Frameworks
React, Gatsby
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of reputable third-party scripts
  • Secure form inputs

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), Visual Website Optimizer
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
ads.smartstream.tv, adsafety.net
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot, Visual Website Optimizer
Marketing tools
Visual Website Optimizer, Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern web technologies and frameworks.
  2. Strong privacy and cookie consent mechanisms implemented.
  3. No critical security issues detected.
  4. Comprehensive cookie details and third-party vendor disclosures provided.
  5. Clear business and contact information available.
  6. No evidence of phishing, malware, or suspicious activity.
  7. Good SEO and accessibility practices observed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including Gatsby and React, ensuring fast performance and good SEO optimization. Hosting appears to leverage Cloudflare CDN for enhanced delivery and security. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with proper meta tags and structured data for social sharing and SEO. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, providing granular user control. The technical infrastructure is robust and well-maintained, with no significant technical debt or performance bottlenecks detected. Opportunities exist to further modernize by integrating automated security scanning and continuous compliance monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with paraplegie.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review paraplegie.ch.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.