Skip to main content

Security report for paramount.com

Paramount · Media · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Paramount is a leading global media and entertainment company specializing in premium content production and distribution, reaching billions worldwide. The website reflects a mature digital presence with a professional design, clear navigation, and integration of modern technologies such as Drupal CMS, Google reCAPTCHA, and consent management tools. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and bot protection, though some security best practices like explicit security policies and security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is well addressed with visible privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. The absence of WHOIS data is a notable anomaly but does not detract significantly from the overall legitimacy given the corporate branding and content quality. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security transparency and publishing vulnerability disclosure information.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching paramount.com

This scan found 10 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
80
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
Average
84
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention paramount.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
766
Employees
9
Customers
365
Third parties
392
Weak passwords
8%

Latest record dated 2026-05-21 · 38 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for paramount.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –securemail.paramount.com2026-05-21
  • –securemail.paramount.com2026-05-13
  • –securemail.paramount.com2026-02-04
  • –il.paramount.com2026-01-13
  • –securemail.paramount.com2025-07-30

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Paramount holds a strong market position in the media industry as a premium content producer and distributor. Its business model centers on content creation and streaming services, targeting a broad general audience globally. The company leverages partnerships and subsidiaries such as Paramount+ and investor relations platforms to support its operations. The website's content and structure indicate a large enterprise with consistent branding and high-quality content delivery. Growth indicators include active career portals and inclusion & impact initiatives, reflecting corporate social responsibility focus. The digital ecosystem integrates marketing and analytics tools to optimize user engagement and business intelligence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS and bot mitigation via Google reCAPTCHA. Consent management is implemented to comply with privacy regulations. However, the lack of visible security headers and absence of a dedicated security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency and may hinder rapid response to security incidents. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Compliance with GDPR is indicated by privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security maturity is good but could benefit from enhanced documentation and security best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page detailing security practices and incident response procedures.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance contact information availability, including security and data protection officer contacts.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Paramount
Description
Paramount is one of the world’s leading producers of premium entertainment content that connects billions of people in nearly every country in the world.
Key services
Entertainment content production, Media distribution, Streaming services (via Paramount+)
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10, Google reCAPTCHA, Ketch Consent Management, Google Tag Manager, jQuery Mousewheel
Frameworks
Bootstrap (implied by navbar classes)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection
  • Consent management for cookies and privacy

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. Strong branding and professional design consistent with a major media company.
  3. Use of modern web technologies and consent management tools.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage or main navigation.
  5. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual for a corporate domain.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found.
  7. Privacy and cookie policies are present and appear comprehensive.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 10 CMS, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks including jQuery Mousewheel and Google reCAPTCHA for enhanced user interaction and security. Consent management is handled via Ketch, indicating a mature approach to privacy compliance. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing integration. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement through optimization of external scripts and assets. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a robust and scalable digital presence suitable for an enterprise media company.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 62/100Medium25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with paramount.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review paramount.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.