Skip to main content

Security report for para.mt

Paramount · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Paramount is a globally recognized leader in the media and entertainment industry, producing premium content that reaches billions worldwide. Their business model centers on content production, distribution, and direct-to-consumer streaming services such as Paramount+. The website reflects a mature digital presence with a modern CMS, responsive design, and integrated consent management, indicating a high level of digital maturity. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement, use of reCAPTCHA, and consent tools, though explicit security headers could be more visible. The absence of WHOIS data is a notable gap but does not detract significantly from the overall legitimacy given the brand's prominence. Strategic recommendations include enhancing transparency around security policies and incident response contacts to further build trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching para.mt

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
80
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention para.mt, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for para.mt right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Paramount holds a leading market position in global entertainment, leveraging a diverse portfolio including streaming, film production, and news. Their competitive advantage lies in premium content ownership and a broad distribution network. Revenue streams include subscription services, advertising, and content licensing. The target audience spans general consumers globally, with a focus on digital streaming users. Partnerships with Pluto TV and Paramount+ strengthen their ecosystem. The website's professional design and consistent branding support strong market credibility. Growth indicators include ongoing content expansion and digital platform investments.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS and bot mitigation via Google reCAPTCHA. Consent management is handled by reputable providers, supporting privacy compliance. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not clearly visible in the provided data, which could be improved. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Incident response contact information is not prominently available, which is a potential compliance and operational gap. Overall, the security maturity is good but could benefit from enhanced transparency and header implementation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and explicitly document security headers such as CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish clear incident response and security contact information on the website.
  3. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries for vulnerabilities and update accordingly.
  4. Enhance WHOIS transparency or provide domain registration details to improve trust.
  5. Maintain and improve privacy compliance measures, including GDPR and cookie consent mechanisms.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Paramount
Description
Paramount is one of the world’s leading producers of premium entertainment content that connects billions of people in nearly every country in the world.
Key services
premium entertainment content production, streaming services (Paramount+), news and sports content
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10, Google reCAPTCHA, Ketch Consent Management, Azure Front Door CDN
Frameworks
Bootstrap (implied by navbar classes)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection
  • Consent management via Ketch and OneTrust scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Ketch Consent Management, OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Strong branding and consistent use of company logos and colors
  3. Multiple official social media links present
  4. Use of modern CMS (Drupal 10) and consent management tools
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found on homepage content
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain registration trust analysis
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 10, a modern and secure CMS platform, and uses Azure Front Door CDN for hosting and performance optimization. The tech stack includes Google reCAPTCHA and Ketch for consent management, indicating a focus on security and privacy. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement in load times and resource optimization. The technical infrastructure supports a robust and scalable digital presence suitable for an enterprise media company.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with para.mt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review para.mt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.