Skip to main content

Security report for pantanet.de

pantamedia communication · Media · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and Network security.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Pantamedia communication is a German-based full-service agency specializing in public relations, advertising, and marketing with over 30 years of experience. The company focuses on serving clients in political and business sectors, offering services such as print design, logo design, text design, and web design. The website is professionally designed using WordPress with the Enfold theme and includes a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism via Cookiebot, reflecting good privacy compliance. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data for the domain raises concerns about domain legitimacy, despite the professional and consistent business presentation. The technical infrastructure is modern and adequate, though security headers and explicit security policies are not evident. Overall, the site demonstrates a good security posture and privacy compliance but would benefit from enhanced transparency regarding domain registration and security policies.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pantanet.de

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention pantanet.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for pantanet.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Pantamedia holds a strong market position as an experienced agency with long-term client relationships, particularly in the political and institutional sectors. Their business model is service-oriented, focusing on creative and strategic communication solutions. The company targets businesses and organizations requiring professional PR and marketing services. The website content and structure support this positioning, emphasizing efficiency, networked contacts, and tailored communication. The lack of visible contact emails or phone numbers suggests reliance on contact forms and Impressum disclosures, common in German business websites. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and a cookie consent management system, indicating baseline security and privacy awareness. Cookiebot is used for granular user consent, and Piwik (Matomo) analytics is implemented with minimal user tracking. However, no HTTP security headers were detected in the provided data, and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. The absence of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure mechanism limits transparency and responsiveness to security issues. The missing WHOIS data for the domain is a notable risk factor, potentially indicating recent registration or privacy protection that complicates trust verification. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with enhanced header configurations and public security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve security communication.
  4. Investigate and clarify domain WHOIS registration details to improve trust and legitimacy perception.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and WordPress plugins to ensure no vulnerable components are present.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
pantamedia communication
Description
Full-service agency for public relations, advertising and marketing with over 30 years of experience, focusing on clients in politics and business, offering print design, logo design, text design, and web design services.
Key services
Print-Design, Logo-Design, Text-Design, Web-Design
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, jQuery 3.7.1, Cookiebot consent management, Enfold theme, HTML5, CSS3
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Piwik (Matomo) Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in German language.
  2. Uses WordPress CMS with Enfold theme and Cookiebot for consent management.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML snippet; contact likely via contact form or Impressum page.
  4. No security.txt or explicit security policy pages found.
  5. Cookie consent is implemented with granular user controls and detailed cookie declarations.
  6. No signs of adult or NSFW content.
  7. WHOIS data missing, which is a concern for domain legitimacy verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website runs on WordPress 6.8.2 with the Enfold theme, leveraging jQuery 3.7.1 and Cookiebot for consent management. The site uses modern web standards including HTML5 and CSS3, with responsive design elements for good mobile optimization. Performance appears moderate, with some background images and scripts loaded asynchronously. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and RSS feeds. Accessibility is basic but present. Hosting provider details are not evident from the data. The technical stack is typical for a professional small agency website, with opportunities to improve security headers and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pantanet.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pantanet.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.