Skip to main content

Security report for pantamedia.com

pantamedia communication · Media · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and Network security.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Pantamedia communication is a German full-service agency specializing in public relations, advertising, and marketing with over 30 years of experience. The company focuses on serving clients in the political and economic sectors, offering services such as print design, logo design, text design, and web design. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image targeting businesses and organizations requiring strategic communication and marketing support. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Enfold theme and integrates Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie consent management. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Security-wise, the website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks some advanced security headers and explicit security or incident response policies. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a concern for domain legitimacy, although the website's professional presentation and compliance measures suggest a legitimate business. Overall, the site scores well in content quality, technical implementation, and privacy compliance, with room for improvement in business credibility and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pantamedia.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention pantamedia.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for pantamedia.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Pantamedia operates as a small media sector agency with a service-based business model focused on PR, marketing, and design services. Its market position is strong within the German political and economic landscape, leveraging long-term client relationships and a central location in Berlin. The company targets associations, firms, and institutions needing political and economic communication expertise. Revenue streams likely derive from client service contracts in PR and marketing campaigns. The website indicates a mature partnership ecosystem and a focus on trust and efficiency. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The business demonstrates consistent branding and professional content, supporting its credibility in the market.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enabled and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism via Cookiebot, supporting GDPR compliance. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No explicit security policy or incident response information is published, which limits transparency and preparedness perception. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure channel is a gap. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a small agency website but could be improved to align with best practices and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance web security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve trust with security researchers.
  4. Include explicit company contact emails and phone numbers on the website to enhance business credibility and user trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
pantamedia communication
Description
Full-Service-Agentur für Public Relations, Werbung und Marketing mit über 30 Jahren Erfahrung, spezialisiert auf Wirtschaft und Politik, mit Fokus auf klare Kommunikation, Wissen und Kontakte.
Key services
Print-Design, Logo-Design, Text-Design, Web-Design, Public Relations, Advertising, Marketing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Cookiebot
Frameworks
Enfold Theme, Avia Framework
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Piwik Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot, Piwik Analytics
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Professional design with clear navigation and business focus.
  3. Uses WordPress CMS with Enfold theme and Cookiebot for cookie consent.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content; contact is via form.
  5. Privacy policy and cookie consent mechanisms are implemented and GDPR compliant.
  6. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  7. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual and lowers trust slightly.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. No adult or NSFW content present.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Enfold theme and Avia Framework, which provides a robust and flexible foundation. It employs jQuery and integrates Cookiebot for cookie consent management, indicating attention to privacy compliance. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design elements and good SEO practices including meta tags and structured data. Performance is moderate, with some background images and scripts that could be optimized further. Accessibility features are basic but present. The technical stack is standard for small to medium-sized agency websites, with opportunities to enhance security and performance through additional headers and optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pantamedia.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pantamedia.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.