Skip to main content

Security report for pannacafe.lv

Kafejnīca Panna · Hospitality · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kafejnīca Panna operates a small chain of cafes in Latvia specializing in traditional Latvian cuisine, including soups, salads, main dishes, and desserts. Founded in 2008, the business has expanded to three locations and targets local customers and visitors seeking authentic dining experiences. The website is built on the Webflow platform, utilizing modern web technologies such as Google Fonts, jQuery, and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is well-designed with good mobile optimization and clear navigation, reflecting a professional hospitality brand. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies, lack of visible contact information, and missing security headers indicate gaps in privacy compliance and security posture. No WHOIS data was available due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and safe user experience but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pannacafe.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention pannacafe.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for pannacafe.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business is positioned as a local hospitality provider with a focus on traditional Latvian cuisine, operating three cafes in different Latvian towns. Its business model is brick-and-mortar food service with banquet offerings. The company leverages social media platforms like Facebook and Instagram to engage customers. The website content is consistent with the business's hospitality focus and shows moderate digital maturity with Webflow CMS and standard analytics integration. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries. The company appears to be a small-sized enterprise with steady growth since 2008. The lack of detailed business registration or VAT information on the website limits deeper business intelligence insights.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and includes Google Tag Manager for analytics but lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. No forms or input fields were detected that collect sensitive data, reducing immediate risk exposure. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations, which is a significant compliance gap given the EU jurisdiction. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency and readiness for security incidents. Overall, the security posture is basic and requires improvements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Add a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  2. Implement standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to improve site security.
  3. Publish clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers for customer and security incident communication.
  4. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities and improve performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Kafejnīca Panna
Description
Kafejnīca Panna is a hospitality business operating three cafes located in Lielvārde, Aizkraukle, and Koknese, Latvia. They offer a variety of traditional Latvian cuisine including soups, salads, main dishes, and desserts. The business started in 2008 and expanded to multiple locations by 2019.
Key services
Traditional Latvian main dishes, Soups, salads, and appetizers, Desserts including cakes and panna cotta, Banquet services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Fonts, jQuery 3.5.1, Google Tag Manager (gtag.js)
Frameworks
Webflow
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics via gtag.js
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service pages detected.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the homepage HTML.
  4. Social media presence is strong with multiple Facebook and Instagram links.
  5. Website uses Webflow CMS and hosting with standard third-party scripts.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data; SSL status unknown.
  7. Content is professionally presented and relevant to hospitality industry.
  8. No explicit or adult content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS and hosted on Webflow's CDN, ensuring modern infrastructure and reasonable performance. It uses Google Fonts for typography and jQuery 3.5.1 for scripting, along with Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and clear navigation. However, no advanced accessibility features were detected beyond basic standards. SEO optimization is basic with proper meta viewport and title tags but lacks structured data or Open Graph tags. The site does not expose any forms or user input fields, reducing complexity but also limiting user engagement features. Performance is moderate, with no explicit speed metrics available. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small hospitality website but could be enhanced with improved SEO, accessibility, and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pannacafe.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pannacafe.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.