Skip to main content

Security report for pankrea.cz

PANKREA s.r.o. · Media · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

PANKREA s.r.o. is a small creative PR agency based in the Czech Republic specializing in public relations, corporate identity, web design, marketing, and custom programming services. The company targets businesses seeking to build and promote their brand identities through professional web presence and marketing communication. The website presents a professional image with clear service offerings and client references, positioning PANKREA as a creative and expert partner in the media and marketing sector. Technically, the website uses modern tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Google reCAPTCHA, and is built on the Estofan CMS platform. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Security-wise, the site employs reCAPTCHA and cookie consent mechanisms but lacks visible security headers and publicly disclosed security policies. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trustworthiness, but the website content and business information appear legitimate and professional. Overall, the site scores well on content quality and technical implementation but has room for improvement in security posture and privacy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pankrea.cz

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
55
Email security
87
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention pankrea.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for pankrea.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

PANKREA operates in the media sector as a creative PR and marketing agency, focusing on small to medium-sized businesses. Their business model revolves around providing tailored marketing, branding, and web development services. The company leverages partnerships with various clients, as evidenced by multiple client logos and references on the website. The target market includes businesses seeking to enhance their public image and digital presence. The company demonstrates a consistent branding approach and maintains active social media engagement, primarily on Facebook. While no financial or founding year data is available, the company appears established and focused on creative marketing solutions. The lack of WHOIS data is a notable gap but does not detract significantly from the business intelligence derived from the website content.

Security posture

The website shows moderate security maturity with the implementation of Google reCAPTCHA to prevent automated abuse and a cookie consent banner aligned with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options indicates potential gaps in defense-in-depth. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. The use of third-party scripts from Google and Facebook introduces a moderate tracking footprint. The missing WHOIS data and lack of DNSSEC information reduce domain trust and could be a concern for domain legitimacy. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small marketing agency but could be enhanced by adopting additional security best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Verify and strengthen SSL/TLS configuration to ensure robust encryption and prevent downgrade attacks.
  3. Publish explicit security policies and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate risks from vulnerable libraries or supply chain attacks.
  5. Improve domain registration transparency by ensuring WHOIS data is complete and accurate to increase trustworthiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
PANKREA s.r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
PANKREA s.r.o.
Description
Kreativní PR agentura PANKREA vytváří firmám identity, pomáhá budovat značku, tvoří profi webové stránky a podporuje marketing.
Key services
Public relations, Corporate identity creation, Web design and SEO, Advertising and marketing, Custom programming
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA
Platforms
Estofan CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection
  • Cookie consent banner with GDPR notice

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  3. Website uses modern tracking and security tools like Google Analytics and reCAPTCHA.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy are present and GDPR compliant.
  5. No explicit security headers detected in HTML source.
  6. Business contact info is clearly presented with phone and physical address.
  7. Website content is professional and targeted at business clients for PR and marketing services.
  8. No evidence of adult or questionable content.
  9. Website uses Estofan CMS platform.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Estofan CMS platform and uses common web technologies including jQuery and Google services for analytics and tag management. The site loads asynchronously Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager scripts, and integrates Google reCAPTCHA for bot mitigation. The HTML structure is well-formed with appropriate meta tags for SEO and viewport settings for mobile responsiveness. Performance is moderate with no evident blocking scripts. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with ARIA attributes and semantic HTML enhancements. The site uses a slider plugin (Nivo Slider) for image presentation. No server-side or hosting provider information was detected. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small agency website but could benefit from modern frontend frameworks and enhanced accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 57/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pankrea.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pankrea.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.