Skip to main content

Security report for pagerank.cz

Media · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

PageRank.cz is a Czech language online magazine specializing in internet-related topics such as SEO, SEM, graphic design, UX, usability, coding, affiliate marketing, domains, copywriting, marketing, and PPC. The website serves a niche audience of internet marketers, SEO professionals, web developers, and online business owners. It operates primarily as a content publishing platform with monetization through advertising and affiliate marketing. The site is built on WordPress CMS and integrates Google services including Analytics, Tag Manager, and Adsense for tracking and monetization. The technical infrastructure is modern but basic, with moderate performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and some security headers, but lacks advanced security policies and incident response information. Privacy and cookie policies are present but basic, with limited GDPR compliance indicators. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a notable concern for domain legitimacy and trustworthiness. Overall, the website is professional and content-rich, but could improve transparency and security practices.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of pagerank.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
45/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pagerank.cz

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
45
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

PageRank.cz holds a niche position in the Czech internet marketing media sector, providing valuable content and resources for professionals and enthusiasts. Its business model relies on content monetization through advertising and affiliate partnerships, as evidenced by multiple external affiliate and partner links. The site maintains a consistent brand and content strategy focused on SEO, marketing, and web technologies. While the site lacks explicit company registration or contact details, it demonstrates steady content updates and engagement through categories and RSS feeds. The partnership ecosystem includes affiliate marketing and advertising networks, but no direct subsidiaries or parent company relationships are evident. Growth indicators include recent articles and active content categories, positioning it as a relevant resource in its market segment.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates Google verification and analytics scripts, indicating a baseline security posture. However, it lacks comprehensive security headers such as Strict-Transport-Security, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No evidence of a published security policy or incident response plan is found, which limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The absence of WHOIS data raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, which could impact trust. Forms present on the site collect user credentials for login but do not show explicit security measures like CAPTCHA or multi-factor authentication. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could benefit from enhanced headers, policies, and domain registration transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce additional HTTP security headers including Strict-Transport-Security, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen web security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure domain legitimacy and improve trustworthiness.
  4. Enhance privacy and cookie policies to explicitly address GDPR compliance and user consent mechanisms.
  5. Add explicit contact information such as company emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Online magazine focused on internet topics including SEO, SEM, graphics, UX, usability, coding, affiliate marketing, domains, copywriting, marketing, and PPC.
Key services
Publishing articles on SEO, SEM, marketing, UX, graphics, Web directory/catalog, Affiliate marketing content, Advertising space
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.8.10, jQuery 3.6.0, Google Fonts, Google Analytics, Google Adsense, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google site verification
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Czech language internet marketing magazine with active content publishing.
  2. Uses WordPress CMS with standard plugins and Google services for analytics and advertising.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact via login/registration forms only.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present but basic; no explicit GDPR compliance statements found.
  5. No security policy or incident response information publicly available.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, which reduces trustworthiness from domain registration perspective.
  7. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.8.10 with jQuery 3.6.0 and uses Google Fonts for typography. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking, and Google Adsense for advertising. The site uses a responsive design with basic mobile optimization and clear navigation menus. Performance is moderate with standard content loading times. Accessibility features are basic, with some support for older browsers via conditional scripts. SEO optimization is good, with proper meta tags, RSS feeds, and structured navigation. The site lacks advanced technical security configurations and could improve in performance optimization and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 60/100Medium34 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pagerank.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pagerank.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.