Skip to main content

Security report for pag-apartments.info

Hospitality · Croatia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

37/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website pag-apartments.info serves as a regional accommodation portal focused on the Island Pag area in Croatia, offering listings of private apartments, rooms, and houses for vacationers. It facilitates direct booking with accommodation owners and targets tourists seeking lodging options on the island. The business model is a niche hospitality listing platform with a small market presence. Technically, the site is built with legacy HTML and CSS, lacking modern frameworks or CMS, and shows poor mobile optimization and accessibility. Security posture is weak, with no HTTPS detected and absence of security headers or privacy policies. No contact information or incident response details are provided, limiting trust and compliance. Overall, the site is functional for its purpose but requires significant improvements in security, privacy, and technical modernization to enhance user trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pag-apartments.info

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
37

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The portal operates in the hospitality sector, focusing on a specific geographic niche—Island Pag, Croatia. It aggregates accommodation listings from various providers, linking to their external websites. The business likely generates revenue through advertising or referral commissions. The partnership with a local design studio indicates a small-scale operation. The lack of detailed company information and absence of contact details suggest a low-profile business. Growth potential depends on improving digital presence, security, and compliance to attract more users and partners.

Security posture

The website currently exhibits a low security maturity level. The absence of HTTPS is a critical vulnerability, exposing users to data interception risks. No security headers or privacy policies are implemented, indicating poor compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. The lack of contact information for security incidents or data protection officers further weakens the security posture. No evidence of vulnerability disclosures or incident response readiness is found. Immediate actions are needed to implement SSL/TLS, security headers, privacy and cookie policies, and clear contact channels for security and privacy concerns.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS across the entire website to secure user data and improve trust.
  2. Develop and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR.
  3. Add clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for business and security incident reporting.
  4. Enhance mobile responsiveness and accessibility to improve user experience and SEO.
  5. Introduce security headers and conduct regular security audits to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Island Pag private accommodation portal. You can find accommodation of all types, in many destinations on the Island Pag. Direct booking with the accommodation owner.
Key services
Listing of private accommodation including apartments, rooms, houses, Direct booking facilitation with accommodation owners, Accommodation search by star rating and location, Accommodation request service
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a regional accommodation portal for Island Pag, Croatia.
  2. Content is primarily static HTML with no modern frameworks detected.
  3. No HTTPS or security headers detected in provided data; security posture is weak.
  4. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the site.
  6. Multiple external links to accommodation providers and partners are present.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected; minimal user tracking.
  8. Mobile optimization and accessibility are poor due to fixed width tables and legacy HTML.
  9. No signs of adult or NSFW content; content is safe for general audiences.
  10. WHOIS data is unavailable or unsupported for this TLD, limiting domain trust verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using basic HTML and CSS without modern web technologies or CMS platforms. The use of fixed-width tables and legacy character encoding (windows-1250) indicates outdated design practices. No JavaScript frameworks or analytics tools are detected, resulting in minimal user tracking but also limited interactivity and performance optimization. Hosting provider and SSL configuration details are not available. The site would benefit from modernization including responsive design, semantic HTML5, and integration of performance and security best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pag-apartments.info. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pag-apartments.info.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.