Skip to main content

Security report for p-h.at

Ploier + Hörmann · Energy · Austria

Partial score · DNS & email only

59/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ploier + Hörmann is a medium-sized Austrian construction company specializing in energy and telecommunications infrastructure, with over 50 years of experience. The company operates as part of the larger Unternehmensgruppe LEYRER + GRAF, which strengthens its market position and resource base. Their website is professionally designed using TYPO3 CMS, providing clear navigation and relevant content targeted at clients in the construction and infrastructure sectors. However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS severely impacts their security posture and user trust. While cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented, there is a lack of explicit security policies or incident response information. The company maintains active social media channels and links to sister companies, indicating a well-connected business ecosystem.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

Checks completed
5of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching p-h.at

This scan found 5 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
Average
59

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company leverages its long-standing market presence and affiliation with the LEYRER + GRAF group to maintain a competitive edge in infrastructure construction services. Their business model focuses on delivering high-quality, reliable construction services in energy, telecom, and civil engineering sectors. The website content and linked domains reflect a cohesive corporate group structure. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the main site suggests a preference for controlled contact via forms or group channels. Their marketing and analytics tools indicate moderate user tracking balanced with privacy considerations.

Security posture

The website currently lacks a valid SSL certificate and does not support HTTPS, exposing users to potential interception risks. Security headers are partially implemented but insufficient to mitigate modern threats fully. No advanced security policies, vulnerability disclosures, or incident response contacts are published, indicating a low maturity level in security governance. The use of reputable CMS and hosting providers is positive but overshadowed by the critical lack of encryption. Immediate remediation is required to secure communications and improve trust.

Recommendations

  1. Acquire and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Implement comprehensive security headers including HSTS with preload and subdomain inclusion.
  3. Publish clear security policies and incident response contacts to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and providing explicit user rights information.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize vulnerabilities and privacy risks.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on TYPO3 CMS, a robust and widely used open-source content management system, hosted on Austrian infrastructure (internex.at). The front-end uses modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and RequireJS, and integrates Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for marketing and analytics. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive images and accessibility features like skip links. However, the lack of HTTPS and modern TLS protocols is a significant technical deficiency. Performance metrics are unavailable, but the site structure and resource usage suggest moderate performance. SEO and metadata are well implemented with Open Graph and canonical tags.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with p-h.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review p-h.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.