Skip to main content

Security report for oxfamibis.dk

Oxfam ibis · Non-profit organization management · Denmark

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of oxfamibis.dk. View the latest report
5 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
2of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings in the checks that completed. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Medium

      Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

      Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

      What to do: Update privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR requirements and user rights

Keep watching oxfamibis.dk

Only DNS and email could be checked this time. Monitoring re-checks every day and emails you when something material changes.

Daily monitoring

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

GDPR outside view
83
Average
83
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • SSL/TLS: did not complete in this scan.
  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • Email security: did not complete in this scan.
  • DNS health: did not complete in this scan.
  • Network security: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Oxfam Danmark holds a strong market position as a non-profit with a long history and clear mission against inequality. Its business model revolves around advocacy and community engagement, supported by fundraising efforts. The website targets socially conscious individuals and stakeholders interested in justice and equality. The organization benefits from a consistent branding strategy and uses modern digital tools to engage visitors. While the site lacks explicit legal documents and direct contact details, it maintains trust through secure infrastructure and cookie consent mechanisms. The absence of partner or subsidiary domains suggests a focused operational scope. The use of advanced analytics and monitoring tools indicates a mature digital presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers likely in place. The integration of CSP violation monitoring and use of Cookiebot for consent management reflect adherence to security best practices. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. However, the lack of a published security policy or incident response contact channels limits transparency in security governance. The site would benefit from publishing a security.txt file and providing explicit security and incident response information to enhance trust and compliance. Overall, the security maturity is good for a non-profit organization.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page clearly linked on the website.
  2. Add a terms of service page to clarify user agreements and legal terms.
  3. Provide clear and accessible contact information including emails and phone numbers.
  4. Implement a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and incident reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Oxfam Danmark
Description
I mere end 50 år har Oxfam bekæmpet ulighed og kæmpet for retfærdighed. Tag del i fælleskabet og støt os i kampen for en retfærdig fremtid.
Key services
Advocacy against inequality, Fundraising for social justice causes
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, New Relic monitoring, Cookiebot CMP, Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • CSP violation monitoring

Analytics and tracking

Services
New Relic, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
New Relic
Marketing tools
Cookiebot CMP
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with strong security headers
  2. Cookie consent implemented via Cookiebot with granular controls
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found in HTML content
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in provided content
  5. Uses New Relic and Google Tag Manager for analytics and monitoring
  6. No signs of WAF or content blocking
  7. Professional and consistent branding and design
  8. Focus on social justice and non-profit advocacy
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 56/100Medium34 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with oxfamibis.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review oxfamibis.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

oxfamibis.dk security report (partial scan) | Guard