Skip to main content

Security report for oxfamibis.dk

Oxfam Danmark · Non-profit · Denmark

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Oxfam Danmark is a well-established non-profit organization focused on combating inequality and advocating for social justice in Denmark. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, targeting a general audience interested in social equity and community engagement. The organization has a history dating back over 50 years, with the domain registered since 2009, aligning with its operational timeline. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript modules, integrates Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie consent, and uses Google Tag Manager and New Relic for analytics and performance monitoring. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though DNSSEC is not enabled and security headers are not explicitly detected. Privacy compliance is supported by the cookie consent mechanism, but no explicit privacy policy or terms of service were found in the provided content. Overall, the website is trustworthy, well-maintained, and suitable for its non-profit mission.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching oxfamibis.dk

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
65
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
83
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the non-profit sector with a focus on social justice and equality advocacy. Its business model revolves around community engagement and fundraising to support its causes. The website content and metadata emphasize its long-standing commitment to fighting inequality. The lack of direct contact information on the main page suggests that contact details may be located elsewhere or handled through other channels. The use of Cookiebot and New Relic indicates a mature approach to compliance and performance monitoring. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the content. The organization's market position is stable within the Danish non-profit landscape, leveraging digital tools to maintain engagement and transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enabled and active cookie consent management. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers like Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options represents areas for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The integration of New Relic suggests ongoing monitoring for performance and error tracking, which supports proactive security management. However, no explicit security policy or incident response information is available, which could enhance transparency and preparedness. The domain registration is consistent and transparent, further supporting trustworthiness.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure.
  3. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Publish explicit privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the homepage.
  5. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts to improve transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Oxfam Danmark
Description
I mere end 50 år har Oxfam bekæmpet ulighed og kæmpet for retfærdighed. Tag del i fælleskabet og støt os i kampen for en retfærdig fremtid.
Key services
Advocacy against inequality, Fundraising for social justice causes, Community engagement
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript ES Modules, Cookiebot Consent Management, Google Tag Manager, New Relic Browser Monitoring
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, New Relic Browser Monitoring
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
New Relic Browser Monitoring
Marketing tools
Cookiebot Consent Management
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS and modern web technologies.
  2. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot with a visible consent dialog.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found in the provided HTML content.
  4. No direct contact information (email, phone, address) found in the provided content.
  5. New Relic monitoring scripts indicate active performance and error monitoring.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page detected.
  7. WHOIS data shows domain is active and registered since 2009 with no DNSSEC enabled.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. Website content is in Danish language targeting Danish audience.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses modern JavaScript modules and asynchronous script loading, indicating a contemporary front-end architecture. Cookiebot is integrated for cookie consent management, ensuring GDPR compliance. Google Tag Manager and New Relic scripts are present for analytics and performance monitoring. The site loads CSS and JS assets from its own domain, suggesting self-hosted or dedicated hosting. No CMS or hosting provider is explicitly identified. Performance appears moderate with preloading of critical assets. Mobile optimization is good, and basic accessibility features like focus-visible are present. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph data. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security headers and DNSSEC.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 75/100Medium10 findings · partial scanView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with oxfamibis.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review oxfamibis.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.