Skip to main content

Security report for osterfruehling.at

IAI VERANSTALTUNGS GMBH · Hospitality · Austria

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

IAI VERANSTALTUNGS GMBH operates the Osterfrühling Innsbruck website, promoting a regional Easter market and associated cultural events in Innsbruck, Austria. The company targets tourists and local visitors interested in seasonal festivities, offering event organization and family-friendly programming. The website is professionally designed with consistent branding and clear navigation, supporting a positive user experience. Technically, the site uses Microsoft IIS hosting with modern TLS protocols, integrates Google Analytics and Usercentrics for consent management, and embeds multimedia content from YouTube and Vimeo. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced, HSTS enabled, and key security headers present, though OCSP stapling and CSP headers could improve security further. Privacy compliance is addressed with visible privacy and cookie policies and a consent mechanism. Contact information is comprehensive and consistent with WHOIS data, enhancing business credibility. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-maintained, though SEO is limited by a noindex,nofollow robots directive.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching osterfruehling.at

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
50
Email security
55
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
18
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business is positioned as a small regional event organizer specializing in Easter-related cultural events in Innsbruck. Its competitive advantage lies in longstanding tradition (20+ years) and strong local partnerships, including with the Zeppelin Group and Innsbruck tourism sites. Revenue likely derives from vendor participation fees, sponsorships, and promotional activities. The target customer segment includes families, tourists, and cultural enthusiasts. The company leverages social media and digital marketing tools to engage audiences. Growth opportunities may include expanding event offerings and enhancing digital presence. The partnership ecosystem includes Zeppelin Group for marketing and Innsbruck tourism for destination promotion.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and HSTS including subdomains and preload enabled, mitigating man-in-the-middle attacks. Security headers like X-Content-Type-Options and X-XSS-Protection are present, reducing common web vulnerabilities. No vulnerable or weak cipher suites were detected. However, OCSP stapling is not enabled, which could affect certificate revocation checking performance. No explicit incident response or security policy pages were found, indicating potential gaps in formal security governance. Privacy compliance is supported by a cookie consent mechanism and privacy policy, but no security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is present. Overall, the site is secure for its business scope but could improve transparency and incident readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Enable OCSP stapling on the web server to improve SSL certificate validation performance and security.
  2. Implement a Content Security Policy (CSP) header to mitigate cross-site scripting and related attacks.
  3. Publish a security policy or security.txt file to provide clear vulnerability disclosure and incident response information.
  4. Review and update third-party scripts regularly to avoid introducing vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider removing or adjusting the robots meta tag to improve SEO and site discoverability.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
IAI VERANSTALTUNGS GMBH
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on Microsoft IIS 8.5 with support for modern TLS protocols including TLS 1.3. It uses Google Analytics for tracking and Usercentrics for cookie consent management, indicating compliance with privacy regulations. The site embeds multimedia content from YouTube and Vimeo and uses JSON-LD structured data for SEO and rich snippets. The CMS appears to be a proprietary or custom solution by Zeppelin Group, with scripts loaded from their cloud domain. Performance data is missing, but the site is responsive and mobile-optimized. Accessibility is basic but present. SEO is partially implemented but limited by the noindex,nofollow directive. The technical stack is modern and adequate for the business needs, with room for improvement in security headers and performance monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with osterfruehling.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review osterfruehling.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.