Skip to main content

Security report for ostboehmen.info

World Media Partners, s.r.o. · Hospitality · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.ostboehmen.info serves as the official tourism portal for the Pardubice region in the Czech Republic, providing comprehensive and updated information about tourist attractions, events, accommodations, and activities in East Bohemia. It is operated by World Media Partners, s.r.o., in cooperation with regional government and tourism organizations, positioning itself as a trusted source for visitors and tourists interested in this region. The portal offers multilingual support and integrates partner endorsements, enhancing its credibility and reach. Technically, the website employs a modern technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for interactivity, Highslide for image display, and analytics tools such as Matomo and Google Analytics. It uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration and implements Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise for bot protection. Cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policies are present, indicating a baseline compliance with privacy regulations. However, some security headers are missing, and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates a moderate security posture with encrypted communications and bot mitigation but lacks comprehensive security headers and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The WHOIS data is unavailable or malformed, which limits domain registration transparency, but the website's official nature and partner affiliations mitigate concerns about legitimacy. No adult or questionable content is present, making the site safe for general audiences. Overall, the site is a professionally designed, content-rich tourism portal with good usability and moderate security measures. Strategic improvements in security headers, incident response transparency, and WHOIS data availability would enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ostboehmen.info

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
55
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ostboehmen.info, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for ostboehmen.info right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The portal targets tourists and visitors interested in the Pardubice region, offering detailed guides on attractions, events, accommodations, and activities. Its business model is informational and promotional, supported by regional government and tourism bodies. The presence of partner logos and official references indicates strong collaboration within the regional tourism ecosystem. The site’s multilingual approach and comprehensive content suggest a focus on broadening market reach. Revenue streams are likely indirect, through tourism promotion and partnerships. The business operates in the hospitality and government sectors, with medium organizational size inferred from content scope and partnerships.

Security posture

The website maintains a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and bot protection via Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise. Cookie consent is implemented, supporting privacy compliance. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces defense-in-depth. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, indicating gaps in transparency and readiness. The WHOIS data is not publicly available, which is common for privacy protection but limits domain trust signals. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for an informational tourism portal but could be improved with enhanced headers and published security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Improve WHOIS data transparency if possible, or provide official registrant contact information on the site.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
World Media Partners, s.r.o.
Description
Offizielle Webseiten der Region Pardubice (Pardubitz), die die touristische Region Ostböhmen vorstellen und komplette und aktualisierte touristische Informationen bieten.
Key services
Tourism information, Event calendar, Accommodation listings, Activity and attraction guides, Newsletter subscription
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, Highslide JS, Matomo Analytics, Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise, Google Analytics, FontAwesome
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise for bot protection
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a well-structured official tourism portal for the Pardubice region in the Czech Republic.
  2. Content is primarily in German with multilingual options linking to other language portals.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the main page; contact likely on other pages.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented and accessible.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools is evident.
  7. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  8. WHOIS data is unavailable or malformed, but website trust is supported by partner logos and official references.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and widely supported technology stack with Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for dynamic content. It integrates Highslide for image galleries and uses Matomo and Google Analytics for visitor tracking. Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise is employed for bot mitigation. The site loads moderately fast and is mobile optimized. Accessibility is basic but present. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site uses standard SEO meta tags and Open Graph tags for social sharing. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from performance optimizations and enhanced accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 69/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ostboehmen.info. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ostboehmen.info.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.