Skip to main content

Security report for osram.com

OSRAM GmbH · Energy · Germany

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

OSRAM GmbH is a global leader in innovative and sustainable lighting solutions, offering a broad portfolio including LED lamps, luminaires, and light management systems. The company targets B2B customers across automotive, entertainment, and industrial sectors, positioning itself as a key player in the energy and transportation industries. The website reflects a mature enterprise with consistent branding and a professional online presence. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript libraries, consent management tools, and integrates analytics and marketing services with user privacy considerations. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and consent mechanisms, though explicit security policies and incident response information are absent. Overall, the site is trustworthy, well-structured, and compliant with GDPR requirements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching osram.com

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
80
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

OSRAM operates in the energy and transportation sectors with a focus on lighting technologies. Its business model revolves around manufacturing and distributing lighting products globally, supported by a strong digital presence and partner ecosystem, including ams OSRAM. The company leverages modern marketing and analytics tools to engage its audience and maintain compliance. The presence of product recall information and comprehensive policies indicates operational transparency. The website serves as a key channel for product information, customer engagement, and corporate communication.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent management, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy or vulnerability disclosure page limits transparency in security governance. No critical vulnerabilities or outdated libraries were detected. The use of third-party tracking scripts is managed via consent, aligning with privacy regulations. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not publicly documented, suggesting room for improvement in security communication.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security frameworks and practices.
  2. Implement and publicize an incident response and vulnerability disclosure process.
  3. Enhance HTTP security headers to improve protection against common web attacks.
  4. Provide clear contact channels for security incidents, such as security@ or abuse@ emails.
  5. Continue to monitor and update third-party libraries and consent mechanisms to maintain compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
OSRAM GmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
OSRAM GmbH
Description
Osram offers innovative and sustainable lighting solutions. The product portfolio of Osram ranges from modules, LED lamps and luminaires to light management systems.
Key services
Automotive Replacement Lamps, Automotive Care & Equipment, Entertainment & Industry Lamps, Light management systems
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, Algolia Search, Usercentrics Consent Management, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • Consent management for cookies
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Usercentrics Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms are present.
  3. No explicit security policy or incident response pages found.
  4. Strong presence of social media links and structured data for business info.
  5. Use of modern tracking and marketing tools with consent management.
  6. Good overall design and navigation with enterprise-level branding consistency.
  7. No suspicious or malicious indicators detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including JavaScript, jQuery, Algolia search, and Usercentrics for consent management. Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel are integrated for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO practices. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization. No CMS was explicitly detected. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Accessibility features are basic but present. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional user experience with room for enhancements in accessibility and performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with osram.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review osram.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.