Skip to main content

Security report for orlenoil.pl

ORLEN OIL · Energy · Poland

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and Security headers.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ORLEN OIL is a subsidiary of the ORLEN Group specializing in the production and distribution of automotive and industrial lubricants, oils, and related products. The company holds certifications from major automotive manufacturers such as Mercedes-Benz, Volkswagen, Volvo, BMW, and Siemens, indicating a strong market position in the energy sector focused on lubricants. The website is built on Microsoft SharePoint, integrating modern consent management tools like Cookiebot and analytics via Google Analytics, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though improvements in security headers and mobile optimization are recommended. Overall, the site presents a professional and trustworthy image with good content quality and compliance with GDPR requirements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching orlenoil.pl

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention orlenoil.pl, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
5
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
5
Weak passwords
20%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for orlenoil.pl.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ORLEN OIL operates in the energy sector with a focus on automotive and industrial lubricants. Its business model centers on manufacturing and distribution, targeting automotive manufacturers and industrial clients. The company benefits from its affiliation with the ORLEN Group, enhancing its market credibility and reach. The website's integration with third-party analytics and consent tools suggests an awareness of digital marketing and compliance trends. However, the absence of explicit contact information and terms of service on the website may limit direct customer engagement. The partnership with lubricantadvisor.com indicates a collaborative ecosystem to enhance product advisory services.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enabled and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism that respects user privacy and GDPR compliance. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The absence of a public security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be enhanced with additional best practices and clearer communication of security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Improve mobile responsiveness and accessibility to provide a better user experience across devices.
  3. Publish clear terms of service and security policy pages to increase transparency and trust.
  4. Add explicit contact information including company emails and phone numbers to facilitate customer and security incident communication.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and update them to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ORLEN OIL
Description
Spółka wchodząca w skład grupy ORLEN, zajmująca się produkcją i dystrybucją środków smarnych dla motoryzacji oraz przemysłu, płynów eksploatacyjnych i kosmetyków. Najwyższą jakość produktów potwierdzają aprobaty producentów: Mercedes-Benz, Volkswagen, Volvo, BMW, Siemens.
Key services
production and distribution of lubricants, automotive oils, industrial fluids, cosmetics
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, SharePoint, Cookiebot, Google Analytics, Nivo Slider
Frameworks
Microsoft SharePoint
Platforms
Windows Server (implied by SharePoint)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot tracking pixels
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses SharePoint CMS platform.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed categories and granular user control.
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on the homepage or main HTML content.
  4. WHOIS data is unavailable, possibly due to registry privacy or technical issues.
  5. Site content is in Polish and targets automotive and industrial lubricant markets.
  6. Multiple external trusted domains used for analytics and consent management.
  7. No signs of malware or phishing detected in the content.
  8. No terms of service page found.
  9. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Microsoft SharePoint, leveraging jQuery and several JavaScript libraries for UI and functionality. Cookiebot is used for cookie consent management, and Google Analytics is integrated for visitor tracking. The site uses multiple CSS stylesheets and scripts loaded asynchronously to optimize performance. While the platform is robust for enterprise content management, the site shows moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. There is no evidence of advanced modern frameworks like React or Angular. The technical stack is stable but could benefit from modernization and performance tuning to improve speed and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with orlenoil.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review orlenoil.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.