Skip to main content

Security report for orlaf.cz

MeDitorial s.r.o. · Healthcare · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.orlaf.cz serves as a specialized medical journal platform focused on otorhinolaryngology and phoniatrics, primarily targeting healthcare professionals in the Czech Republic. Operated by MeDitorial s.r.o., it provides access to journal articles, archives, and specialist content with controlled access via a specialist agreement form. The business model revolves around content provision and professional engagement within a niche healthcare segment. Technically, the site employs a modern JavaScript stack including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and cookie consent tools, ensuring a responsive and user-friendly experience. The site is well-structured with SEO and accessibility considerations, though some improvements in security headers and explicit policy pages are recommended. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and secure form handling, but lacks visible security headers and incident response information. The absence of WHOIS data is a notable concern, impacting domain trustworthiness, though the website content and structured data strongly indicate legitimacy. Cookie consent and privacy policy presence support GDPR compliance. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy for its intended audience, with recommendations to enhance security transparency and domain registration clarity to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching orlaf.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
50
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
40
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention orlaf.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for orlaf.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MeDitorial s.r.o. positions itself as a specialized publisher in the healthcare sector, focusing on otorhinolaryngology and phoniatrics. The company targets healthcare professionals authorized to prescribe or dispense medicinal products, as evidenced by the specialist agreement access control. The business leverages digital content delivery, subscription, and professional engagement models. The partnership with MeDitorial.cz suggests a focused ecosystem for medical publishing. Growth potential lies in expanding digital offerings and enhancing compliance and security to meet evolving regulatory demands.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and CSRF protection on login forms. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could hinder timely security issue management. GDPR compliance is partially addressed through cookie consent and privacy policy presence. The missing WHOIS data raises concerns about domain registration transparency, which should be investigated further to mitigate trust risks.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish clear terms of service, security policy, and incident response information to improve transparency and user trust.
  3. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data issue to ensure domain registration transparency and legitimacy.
  4. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and providing explicit GDPR-related disclosures.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerable components are included and maintain secure dependencies.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
MeDitorial s.r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MeDitorial s.r.o.
Description
Časopis Otorinolaryngologie a foniatrie, a website primarily for healthcare professionals providing articles and information related to otorhinolaryngology and phoniatrics.
Key services
Medical journal articles, Healthcare professional login and registration, Specialist content access
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.4.1, Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts, Magnific Popup, jQuery Validation, Headroom.js, Cookie Consent by mdcdn.cz
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure login form with CSRF token
  • Cookie consent banner

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ad Manager
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professional and targeted at healthcare specialists.
  3. Clear specialist agreement form to restrict access to qualified professionals.
  4. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and Google Tag Manager for analytics.
  5. Cookie consent mechanism present and active.
  6. No explicit privacy or security policy pages linked in main navigation.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  8. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  9. Login and password reset forms use CSRF tokens indicating secure form handling.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and cookie consent scripts to deliver a modern user experience. It loads fonts from Google Fonts and uses Magnific Popup for UI modals. The site is mobile responsive and includes accessibility features such as labels and ARIA roles. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous script loading and deferred main scripts. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is evident. The absence of security headers and incomplete WHOIS data represent technical risks. Overall, the infrastructure supports the business needs but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with orlaf.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review orlaf.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.