Skip to main content

Security report for orkidees.fr

Orkidées Studio · Media · France

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Orkidées Studio is a small French graphic and digital studio specializing in visual identity, packaging, web design, motion design, and editorial services. The website presents a professional and creative image targeting businesses and individuals seeking high-quality design solutions. The technical infrastructure is based on WordPress with Elementor and Borlabs Cookie for cookie consent management, hosted by Infomaniak Network SA, a reputable provider. The site is mobile-optimized and uses modern web technologies, though some SEO and accessibility features could be improved. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA integration, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with a cookie consent mechanism but no visible privacy policy or terms of service. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional, with room for improvement in privacy and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Weak SPF Policy

      SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

      What to do: Use -all or ~all qualifier for better email security

  4. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching orkidees.fr

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
25
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
68
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the media and creative services sector, focusing on graphic and digital design. Its market position is that of a niche creative studio emphasizing quality and innovation. The business model revolves around providing tailored creative solutions including branding, digital content, and editorial services. The target customers are businesses and individuals requiring professional design services. The website indicates a mature business founded in 2007, with consistent branding and clear contact information. The use of professional plugins and cookie consent tools suggests awareness of digital compliance requirements. No partnerships or subsidiaries are explicitly mentioned.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and Google reCAPTCHA protects forms against spam. The Borlabs Cookie plugin provides a granular cookie consent mechanism, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces the security posture. No incident response or security policy information is published, which could hinder transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Overall, the site is secure for typical business use but could enhance its security documentation and header implementation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a clear and comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the website footer.
  2. Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to improve protection against common web attacks.
  3. Add a security.txt file or a dedicated security policy page with incident response contact information.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance SEO and accessibility features to improve user experience and compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Orkidées Studio
Description
Orkidées Studio is a graphic and digital studio offering services in design, digital media, and transversal creative solutions. They focus on visual identity, packaging, edition, web, motion design/video, presentation, writing, illustration, and iconography.
Key services
Visual identity design, Packaging design, Edition, Web design and development, Motion design and video, Presentation design, Writing and editorial services, Illustration and iconography
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Elementor Pro, Contact Form 7, Borlabs Cookie, Google reCAPTCHA, jQuery
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration on forms
  • Cookie consent with granular controls

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Uses modern WordPress CMS with Elementor and Borlabs Cookie for consent management.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the homepage or in metadata.
  4. Cookie consent is comprehensive with granular controls for external media cookies.
  5. Contact information includes phone number and physical address in France.
  6. No security.txt or explicit security policy found.
  7. Google reCAPTCHA is implemented for form protection.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. Website content is professional and targeted at creative digital services.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using Elementor and Elementor Pro for page building, with Contact Form 7 for contact forms and Borlabs Cookie for cookie management. Google reCAPTCHA is integrated for spam protection. The hosting provider is Infomaniak Network SA, a reputable European host. The site loads scripts asynchronously and uses Google Fonts. Performance is moderate with lazy loading for images and background elements. Mobile optimization is good, and the site uses responsive breakpoints. SEO is basic with meta tags and canonical links but lacks advanced structured data or Open Graph tags. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA roles and semantic HTML but could be improved. Overall, the technical stack is modern and appropriate for a small creative studio website.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with orkidees.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review orkidees.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.