Skip to main content

Security report for orion.lt

Orion Securities · Finance · Lithuania

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Orion Securities is a Lithuanian financial services company established in 1993, specializing in investment banking, wealth management, corporate finance, and capital markets. The company targets investors and corporate clients primarily in Lithuania, offering a comprehensive suite of financial services. The website reflects a mature business with consistent branding and a professional online presence. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern libraries and frameworks, including Bootstrap and jQuery, and integrates marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and MailerLite. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and reCAPTCHA implemented; however, the broken contact form shortcode and lack of explicit security headers are notable weaknesses. Privacy compliance is strong, with clear cookie consent mechanisms and a comprehensive privacy policy. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, which limits domain trust verification. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but could improve security and transparency aspects.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching orion.lt

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
60
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
25
Average
54
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Orion Securities holds a solid market position in Lithuania's financial sector, leveraging its long history since 1993. The company’s business model focuses on integrated financial services, combining investment management, corporate finance, and wealth management to serve a diverse client base. The website indicates active marketing and client engagement through newsletters and social media channels. Partnerships with recognized financial entities and presence on LinkedIn, Facebook, and YouTube enhance credibility. The company appears medium-sized with a focus on local and regional markets. Growth indicators include recent news on bond issuances and investment projects. The use of modern digital marketing tools suggests a forward-looking approach to client acquisition and retention.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and Google reCAPTCHA v3 is used to protect forms from spam and abuse. The presence of a cookie consent banner with revoke options indicates GDPR awareness. However, the broken contact form shortcode may hinder secure data collection and user experience. No explicit HTTP security headers (such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options) were detected, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. The use of multiple third-party scripts and tracking pixels increases the attack surface and privacy risks. There is no visible security or incident response policy published on the site. Overall, while basic security measures are in place, improvements are needed to enhance protection and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Repair and test all contact forms to ensure secure and reliable user data submission.
  2. Implement and verify HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Regularly audit and update all third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance privacy disclosures related to tracking and data retention to align with GDPR best practices.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
UAB FMĮ “Orion Securities”
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Orion Securities
Description
Rūpinamės investuotojų finansine gerove nuo 1993-ųjų. • Investicinės bankininkystė • Gerovės vadlymas • Įmonių finansai • Kapitalo rinkos
Key services
Investicinė Bankininkystė, Finansų rinkos, Privati Bankininkystė, Šeimos turto valdymas, VP Paslaugos, Depozitoriumas Fondams
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WPBakery Page Builder, jQuery, Bootstrap 3.3.6, Slick Carousel, AOS (Animate On Scroll), Google Fonts, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, MailerLite
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3
  • Cookie consent banner with revoke option
  • Security plugin (wp-security-hardening) active

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
MailerLite
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and structured data
  2. Uses HTTPS with valid SSL
  3. Contact form shortcode broken, which may impact user submissions
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant
  5. Multiple Facebook Pixels and Google Analytics scripts indicate extensive tracking
  6. No explicit security headers detected in HTML source
  7. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit exceeded, limiting domain trust verification
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using WPBakery Page Builder, Bootstrap 3.3.6, jQuery, and other modern front-end libraries. It integrates Google Fonts for typography and uses Slick Carousel and AOS for UI animations. Analytics and marketing tools include Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and MailerLite for email marketing. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity and SEO optimization via Yoast SEO plugin. Performance is moderate, with multiple external resources loaded from reputable CDNs. The presence of a security hardening plugin indicates proactive security management, though some technical debt is evident in the broken contact form shortcode. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional website but could benefit from performance tuning and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with orion.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review orion.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.