Skip to main content

Security report for origo.com

Origo Services Ltd · Finance · United Kingdom

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, DNS health and 1 other check.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Origo Services Ltd is a UK-based fintech company with over 35 years of experience delivering innovative solutions to the financial services industry. Their offerings include integration hubs, asset migration, transfer tracking, and identity services, targeting financial providers, platforms, and advisers. The company is well-positioned in the UK market, trusted by major financial institutions and advisers, and emphasizes digitizing analogue processes to improve efficiency and connectivity across the sector. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript frameworks, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot, and Hotjar for analytics and marketing, with a good level of mobile optimization and accessibility. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though there is room for improvement in DNSSEC adoption and publishing explicit security policies. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with GDPR, reflecting a mature digital presence aligned with their business goals.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Potential Subdomain Takeover

      Subdomain staging.origo.com points to unregistered service 91d382e563126015501e6941294d85bb-1782121719.eu-west-2.elb.amazonaws.com

      What to do: Remove or fix CNAME record to prevent subdomain takeover

      • WSTG-CONF-10
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching origo.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
70
Email security
85
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Origo operates in the fintech sector, focusing on B2B services that streamline financial services operations through technology. Their business model revolves around providing integration and data migration services that enable faster, more reliable financial transactions and communications. The company leverages partnerships and a strong customer base including Skipton Building Society, Prudential, and Standard Life, which enhances their market credibility. Their growth is supported by continuous innovation and a comprehensive service portfolio that addresses key pain points in the financial advice and platform sectors. The company’s newsletter and webinars indicate active engagement with their audience and thought leadership in the industry.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and a robust cookie consent mechanism that respects user privacy. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security represents areas for enhancement. There is no publicly available security policy or incident response information, which could improve transparency and preparedness. The use of third-party analytics and marketing tools is managed with consent, aligning with GDPR requirements. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from formalized policies and additional technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance domain name system security and prevent DNS spoofing.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Implement security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to harden the website against common attacks.
  4. Consider creating and publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate risks from vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Origo Services Ltd
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Origo Services Ltd
Description
Origo is a fintech company passionate about delivering solutions that connect the financial services industry, digitising analogue processes to create faster, smarter connections for providers, platforms, advisers, and customers. They combine the power of their two brands, Origo and Unipass, to transform the industry.
Key services
Origo Services, Origo Asset Migration, Origo Integration Hub, Origo Transfer Service, Origo Transfer Tracking, Origo Mortality Screening, Origo Dashboard Connector, Pensions Dashboards, Unipass Identity, Unipass Transfer Tracking
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Hotjar, HubSpot, CookieConsent.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and consent mode for privacy

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag, Google Ads, Hotjar, HubSpot Ads Pixel
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Hotjar
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented.
  3. Multiple customer testimonials enhance trust.
  4. No direct email addresses found in HTML; contact via contact page.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response info published.
  6. Use of multiple analytics and marketing tools with consent management.
  7. No DNSSEC enabled, which is a minor security gap.
  8. Domain registration is stable and consistent with business claims.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front end with asynchronous loading of analytics and marketing scripts including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Hotjar, and HubSpot. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and accessibility features such as ARIA labels and skip links. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements by optimizing third-party script loading. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting details are not directly discernible from the HTML. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly experience with room for performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with origo.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review origo.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.