Skip to main content

Security report for orby.network

Orby Protocol · Finance · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Orby Network operates a decentralized finance platform focused on providing interest-free loans through its native overcollateralized stablecoin, USC, on the Cronos blockchain. The platform enables users to deposit supported collateral tokens and borrow USC, allowing asset retention and participation in DeFi yield opportunities. The business positions itself as a pioneering stablecoin issuer within the Cronos ecosystem, leveraging a native protocol token (ORB) to share revenue with stakeholders. Technically, the website is built using modern frameworks such as Next.js and Chakra UI, with analytics integration via Google Analytics and PostHog, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security-wise, the platform emphasizes a security-first approach with an audit by SlowMist, uses HTTPS, and avoids exposing sensitive data, though it lacks some security headers and formal vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. Overall, the platform presents a professional and functional DeFi service with moderate trustworthiness but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and clearer contact and security policies.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching orby.network

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Orby Network targets DeFi users and cryptocurrency investors seeking stablecoin-based lending and yield generation. Its competitive advantage lies in offering interest-free loans backed by overcollateralized stablecoins native to the Cronos network, a niche with growing demand. Revenue streams include protocol fees shared with ORB token holders and liquidator fees from the Stability Pool. The platform's partnership ecosystem includes community channels on Discord, Telegram, Twitter, and Medium for outreach and support. Growth indicators include the launch of native tokens and audit certifications. Strategic observations suggest the need for improved transparency in privacy and security policies to enhance user trust and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The security maturity of Orby Network is moderate to good. The platform employs HTTPS and references a SlowMist audit, indicating attention to smart contract and protocol security. However, the absence of explicit security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS), lack of published privacy and cookie policies, and no visible vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file represent compliance and operational gaps. There is no exposed sensitive data or known vulnerabilities in the website content. Incident response readiness and data protection officer information are not publicly available, which could impact regulatory compliance and user confidence. Overall, the security posture is adequate but requires enhancements in transparency and formal security governance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR and privacy compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options to strengthen web security.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and general inquiries to enhance trust and incident response capabilities.
  5. Regularly review and update security practices and compliance documentation to align with evolving regulatory requirements and industry best practices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Orby Protocol
Description
Orby Protocol is a decentralized lending protocol offering interest-free loans on USC, a native overcollateralized stablecoin. Users deposit accepted collateral to borrow USC, enabling asset retention and participation in DeFi activities.
Key services
Interest-free loans on USC stablecoin, Stablecoin minting backed by collateral, Yield generation via Stability Pool, Protocol token (ORB) staking for revenue share
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Chakra UI, PostHog analytics, Google Analytics
Frameworks
Next.js, Chakra UI
Platforms
Cronos blockchain ecosystem
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of audited smart contracts (SlowMist audit mentioned)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, PostHog
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
PostHog
Marketing tools
PostHog
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the main page.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided.
  4. Social media presence includes Discord, Telegram, Twitter (X), and Medium.
  5. Website uses modern web technologies and frameworks.
  6. Security audit by SlowMist is prominently mentioned.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
  8. No explicit GDPR or data protection officer information found.
  9. Content is focused on DeFi lending and stablecoin use cases.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React-based stack using Next.js and Chakra UI, ensuring responsive design and good accessibility. It leverages PostHog and Google Analytics for user behavior tracking. The site loads quickly and is well-structured with proper meta tags and Open Graph data for SEO and social sharing. However, there is no detected CMS, and hosting provider details are not disclosed. The absence of some security headers and privacy-related pages indicates areas for technical improvement. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional user experience but could benefit from enhanced security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with orby.network. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review orby.network.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.