Skip to main content

Security report for orajel.com

Church & Dwight Co., Inc. · Healthcare · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Email security and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Orajel.com is the official website for Orajel™, a well-established oral care brand owned by Church & Dwight Co., Inc. The site provides comprehensive product information, educational resources, customer testimonials, and support channels including a contact form and embedded chat service. The website targets a general audience including adults and children, emphasizing trusted oral care solutions. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies such as jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and OneTrust for cookie consent, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with clear navigation and professional design. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data exposure, though security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is strong, with clear privacy and cookie policies linked to the parent company. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, which slightly reduces trust but is common for corporate brands. Overall, the website is professional, secure, and trustworthy, supporting the brand's market position.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching orajel.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
65
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website reflects a large healthcare and retail consumer goods business model focused on oral care products. It serves as a marketing and informational platform rather than direct e-commerce. The presence of product recalls, testimonials, and educational content supports customer engagement and trust. The parent company Church & Dwight Co., Inc. is prominently referenced, indicating corporate backing. The site integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools, suggesting active digital marketing strategies. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the site suggests reliance on web forms and chat for customer interaction. The domain WHOIS data is missing, which is a common privacy measure for established brands. The site’s ecosystem includes related domains of the parent company, reinforcing legitimacy.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms, indicating attention to user privacy and security. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not evident and should be added to enhance protection against common web attacks. The use of multiple third-party scripts introduces potential risk vectors that require regular auditing. No explicit security or incident response policies are published on the site, which could be improved to demonstrate security maturity. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from enhanced header policies and transparency on security practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a security policy or incident response page to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards.
  5. Consider providing direct contact information for security or privacy inquiries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Church & Dwight Co., Inc.
Description
The official website for Orajel™, the most trusted oral care brand for adults and children. Orajel™ has oral care solutions for everyone in your family.
Key services
Oral care product information, Customer support via contact form and chat, Resource center with educational content, Product recall information
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Salesforce Embedded Service Chat, Lightning Bolt (Mookie1), Foundation Framework
Frameworks
Foundation
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with POST method

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads, Facebook Ads, Google Ads, Eyeview Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Eyeview Pixel
Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent, Lightning Bolt
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. No WAF or blocking detected
  3. Strong branding and consistent corporate identity
  4. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies linked
  5. Use of multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools
  6. No exposed sensitive data or obvious security flaws in HTML
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, indicating privacy protection or unregistered domain
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern tech stack including jQuery, Foundation framework, and Sitecore CMS (inferred). It uses Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing, and OneTrust for cookie consent management. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate with some heavy scripts but generally good user experience. The site uses embedded Salesforce chat for customer support. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicit. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable web presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with orajel.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review orajel.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.