Skip to main content

Security report for opptica.eu

OPPTICA · Healthcare · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

OPPTICA is a specialized wholesaler of optical goods, medical instruments, and related services, with over 30 years of industry experience. The company targets opticians, optical retailers, and eye care clinics primarily in the Baltic region, positioning itself as a trusted partner offering a broad portfolio of products including lenses, frames, lab equipment, and diagnostic tools. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, supported by partnerships with recognized clinics and manufacturers. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using Elementor and related plugins, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks comprehensive security headers and explicit incident response contacts. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism detected. Overall, the site is credible and trustworthy but could improve in security and privacy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching opptica.eu

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention opptica.eu, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for opptica.eu right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates a wholesale distribution model focused on optical and medical supplies, serving professional customers such as opticians and clinics. Its competitive advantage lies in its extensive product range, long-standing industry expertise, and collaborative partnerships, including custom eyewear collections. The presence of multiple client logos and partner links indicates a well-established network. The business appears small in size but with a focused niche market. Revenue streams likely include product sales, service and maintenance contracts, and customized solutions. The website supports growth through clear contact channels and marketing content emphasizing partnership and innovation.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS ensuring encrypted communications, which is a fundamental security measure. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks like clickjacking and MIME sniffing. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no dedicated security contact emails are provided, which may hinder timely vulnerability reporting and response. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager introduces potential tracking and privacy considerations. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and improving privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy to enhance protection against web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and explicit cookie policy to comply with GDPR and improve user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a security policy and provide dedicated incident response contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve trust.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate risks from vulnerable components.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security assessments to maintain a robust security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
OPPTICA
Description
OPPTICA is a wholesaler specializing in optical goods, services, and medical instruments with over 30 years of expertise. They offer a wide range of products including optical lenses, frames, sunglasses, contact lenses, lab equipment, diagnostic tools, and personalized support for opticians and clinics. They also provide service and maintenance for optical devices and promote customized eyewear collections.
Key services
Wholesale optical goods, Opticians lab equipment supply, Device service and maintenance, Diagnostic and eye care technology distribution, Customized eyewear collections
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Elementskit, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts, FontAwesome
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented with clear business focus on optical and medical supplies.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie consent mechanisms detected, which may impact GDPR compliance.
  4. Security headers are minimal; opportunity to improve security posture.
  5. Multiple partner and client logos indicate established business relationships.
  6. Use of modern WordPress technologies and plugins for site building.
  7. Contact information is present but no direct email addresses found in HTML content.
  8. No visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using Elementor and Elementskit plugins, which provide flexible and responsive design capabilities. The site loads external resources such as Google Fonts and FontAwesome icons, and uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected, and mobile optimization is good. However, the site lacks advanced security headers and explicit privacy controls. The technical infrastructure is suitable for the business needs but would benefit from security hardening and privacy enhancements to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with opptica.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review opptica.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.