Skip to main content

Security report for oppenheim.de

Deutsche Oppenheim Family Office AG · Finance · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Deutsche Oppenheim Family Office AG operates as a wealth management and family office service provider based in Germany, targeting high net worth individuals and families. The company focuses on personalized asset management and family office solutions, positioning itself as a specialized player in the German finance sector. The website's content and branding are consistent and professionally presented, though some key compliance and contact information is missing from the accessible content. Technically, the website employs modern front-end technologies such as Vue.js and PrimeVue components, hosted on German Telekom infrastructure, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the absence of visible security headers, privacy policies, and contact details suggests gaps in security posture and privacy compliance. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security measures to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching oppenheim.de

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
85
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention oppenheim.de, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
1
Weak passwords
100%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for oppenheim.de.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets a niche market segment within the finance industry, focusing on family office and wealth management services. Its business model revolves around personalized asset management for affluent clients. The lack of visible partner or subsidiary domains and minimal WHOIS data limits insight into its broader ecosystem. The website's moderate size and professional design indicate a medium-sized enterprise with a focused market presence. The absence of explicit certifications or trust badges suggests opportunities for strengthening market credibility. The company appears to maintain a clean digital footprint with no detected advertising or tracking technologies, aligning with a privacy-conscious clientele.

Security posture

The website currently lacks visible security best practices such as security headers and explicit SSL/TLS configuration details. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which may hinder rapid response to security issues. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No exposed vulnerabilities or sensitive data were detected in the provided content, but the security posture is considered basic. Enhancing security headers, implementing clear privacy and cookie policies, and providing incident response contacts would significantly improve the security maturity and compliance stance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Include clear and verified contact information including emails and phone numbers to enhance business credibility and user trust.
  5. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate any hidden vulnerabilities and improve overall security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Deutsche Oppenheim Family Office AG
Description
Deutsche Oppenheim Family Office AG is a wealth management company specializing in family office services and asset management.
Key services
Vermögensverwaltung (Asset Management), Family Office Services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Sen font, PrimeVue UI components, CSS3, HTML5
Frameworks
Vue.js, PrimeVue
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is in German and focused on wealth management services.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided HTML content.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links explicitly found in the provided content.
  4. No visible forms or data collection mechanisms detected in the truncated HTML content.
  5. No security or incident response contact information found.
  6. No certifications or compliance badges visible.
  7. Website uses modern front-end technologies but lacks visible SEO and accessibility enhancements.
  8. No advertising or tracking technologies detected in the provided content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with Vue.js and PrimeVue UI components, indicating a contemporary approach to web development. Hosting on Deutsche Telekom name servers suggests reliable infrastructure. The site appears mobile optimized with good design and navigation clarity. However, there is limited evidence of advanced SEO or accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement through optimization. The lack of visible analytics or tracking scripts suggests minimal user tracking, which aligns with privacy considerations but may limit marketing insights. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhancements in SEO, accessibility, and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with oppenheim.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review oppenheim.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.