Skip to main content

Security report for ooegkk.at

Österreichische Gesundheitskasse · Healthcare · Austria

High risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Österreichische Gesundheitskasse (ÖGK) operates as a major public health insurance provider in Austria, delivering comprehensive health insurance services and support to insured individuals, employers, and contract partners. The website serves as an official portal offering information, appointment scheduling, customer service, and career opportunities, targeting Austrian residents and stakeholders in the healthcare sector. The digital presence is supported by a modern technology stack including Apache, Jakarta Faces, and jQuery, managed via a Gentics CMS platform, and hosted within the Austrian social insurance infrastructure. Despite a professional and content-rich website, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support significantly undermines the security posture. The site implements a strong Content Security Policy and cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting good privacy compliance, but the lack of HTTPS and TLS protocols is a critical vulnerability. Social media integration and clear contact information enhance trust and user engagement. Overall, the website is functional and credible but requires urgent security improvements to protect user data and comply with modern standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ooegkk.at

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
50
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ÖGK holds a strong market position as a government-backed healthcare insurer in Austria, serving a broad customer base including insured persons, employers, and healthcare partners. Its business model focuses on public health insurance and social security services, supported by a comprehensive digital portal. The organization leverages partnerships within the Austrian social insurance ecosystem, as evidenced by linked domains and DNS records. The website content and structure indicate a mature digital strategy with clear navigation and relevant services. Revenue streams are primarily from public funding and insurance contributions. The presence of job and career sections suggests ongoing organizational growth and talent acquisition. The partnership ecosystem includes key social insurance entities, enhancing operational synergy and service delivery.

Security posture

The current security posture is weak due to the lack of HTTPS and valid SSL/TLS certificates, exposing users to potential interception and man-in-the-middle attacks. While the site employs a Content Security Policy and sets cookies with Secure and HttpOnly flags, the use of 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval' in scripts reduces CSP effectiveness. No advanced TLS protocols or session resumption mechanisms are enabled, and HSTS is configured but not active. No explicit incident response or security policy pages were found, indicating potential gaps in security governance and transparency. The website does not expose sensitive data or show signs of known vulnerabilities, but the missing HTTPS is a critical risk. Privacy compliance is strong with cookie consent and privacy policies in place. Overall, the site requires immediate SSL implementation and security hardening to meet industry standards and protect user data.

Recommendations

  1. Install and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable TLS 1.2 or higher protocols and disable insecure protocols.
  3. Activate and enforce HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload directives.
  4. Review and tighten Content Security Policy to remove 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval' where possible.
  5. Publish clear security and incident response policies including contact channels for reporting issues.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Österreichische Gesundheitskasse
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a robust technical foundation using Apache server and Jakarta Faces framework, enhanced with jQuery 3.6.0 and Slick Carousel for UI components. The CMS is Gentics, a professional content management system. The site includes multiple CSS and JavaScript resources loaded via internal content delivery paths. Performance metrics are missing but inferred to be slow due to zero load time and resource count reported. Mobile optimization and accessibility are good, with responsive design and accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA labels. SEO is supported by meta tags and structured navigation. Hosting is managed within the Austrian social insurance network, ensuring reliability. However, the lack of HTTPS and modern TLS protocols is a significant technical debt and security risk. The site uses Piwik PRO for analytics, indicating a preference for privacy-conscious tracking solutions.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ooegkk.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ooegkk.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.