Skip to main content

Security report for ooe-ordensspitaeler.at

Oö. Ordensspitäler Koordinations GmbH · Healthcare · Austria

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Oö. Ordensspitäler Koordinations GmbH operates as a regional healthcare coordination entity in Upper Austria, focusing on hospital coordination, training, collective agreements, and patient information. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image, targeting patients, healthcare professionals, and trainees. The business model centers on healthcare service coordination within the regional hospital network. Technically, the site uses a modern tech stack including jQuery, Swiper.js, Orejime for cookie consent, Matomo and Google Analytics for tracking, and is built on the siteswift CMS platform. The site is mobile optimized, accessible, and SEO friendly. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced, anonymized IP tracking, and CSRF protections, though additional security headers could enhance protection. Privacy compliance is strong with clear cookie and privacy policies aligned with GDPR. No direct contact emails or phone numbers were found on the homepage, suggesting contact details are on dedicated subpages. Overall, the website is trustworthy, well-maintained, and suitable for its healthcare audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ooe-ordensspitaeler.at

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a solid position in the regional healthcare sector, coordinating multiple hospitals and providing education and patient services. Its competitive advantage lies in its established network and specialized healthcare focus. The business model likely includes funding from healthcare providers and government bodies. The target customers include patients, healthcare workers, and trainees. The presence of press releases and event announcements indicates active engagement and growth. The partnership ecosystem includes regional hospitals and healthcare organizations. Strategic observations suggest a focus on digital presence and compliance with privacy regulations to maintain trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, anonymized IP tracking in analytics, and cookie consent management. CSRF tokens are implemented for form security. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, which could be improved. Overall, the site balances usability and security well but could enhance defenses and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement additional HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options to mitigate clickjacking and XSS risks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Include clear company contact information on the homepage or footer to improve user trust and accessibility.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Oö. Ordensspitäler Koordinations GmbH
Description
Partner für ein gesundes Oberösterreich✓In guten Händen. Im Ordensspital►Ordensspitäler│Ausbildung&Kollektivverträge│Geschäftsstelle│Patienteninformationen
Key services
Hospital coordination, Training and education, Collective agreements, Patient information
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Swiper.js, Orejime cookie consent, Matomo analytics, Google Analytics, siteswift CMS
Frameworks
siteswift.connected
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • IP anonymization in Google Analytics
  • Cookie consent management with Orejime
  • CSRF token usage in forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on healthcare coordination and hospital services in Upper Austria.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and GDPR compliant.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage; contact info likely on subpages.
  5. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and CMS indicates a maintained site.
  6. Security headers could be improved for enhanced protection.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and well-supported technology stack including jQuery, Swiper.js for sliders, and Orejime for cookie consent management. It is built on the siteswift CMS platform, which provides structured content management. Performance is moderate with lazy loading of images and optimized scripts. The site is mobile responsive and includes accessibility features such as keyboard navigation and ARIA roles. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Technical risks are low, but the site could benefit from enhanced security headers and more explicit hosting information.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ooe-ordensspitaeler.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ooe-ordensspitaeler.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.