Skip to main content

Security report for onninen.no

Onninen AS · Energy · Norway

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Onninen AS operates as a leading electrical wholesaler in the Nordic region, primarily serving contractors, projects, and industrial clients with a broad product range exceeding 100,000 electrical items. The company maintains a strong market position supported by a network of 26 express stores across Norway and a comprehensive online webshop. Their business model focuses on rapid delivery and extensive product availability, targeting professional customers in the energy and industrial sectors. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies including React, Contentful CMS, and integrates Google Tag Manager and YouTube APIs for analytics and media embedding. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO and accessibility features, reflecting a mature digital presence. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and secure form handling, though explicit security policies and incident response information are not publicly disclosed. Privacy compliance is robust, with clear privacy and cookie policies aligned with GDPR requirements. Overall, the website and business demonstrate high professionalism and trustworthiness, though WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection, which is justified for a commercial entity of this scale.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching onninen.no

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
60
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Onninen AS holds a significant position in the Nordic electrical wholesale market, leveraging a multi-channel distribution strategy combining physical express stores and an online platform. Their competitive advantage lies in a vast product catalog, rapid delivery capabilities, and specialized customer service teams, including dedicated support for energy utilities. The company’s partnerships with industry associations and course providers enhance their market reach and customer engagement. Revenue streams are primarily from wholesale and retail sales of electrical products. The target customer segments include contractors, industrial clients, and energy sector companies. Growth indicators include active marketing campaigns, product promotions, and educational offerings. The company’s digital ecosystem integrates third-party services for analytics and marketing, supporting data-driven business decisions.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS encryption and secure handling of user inputs in forms. No sensitive data exposure or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates areas for improvement in transparency and readiness. The integration of third-party analytics and marketing tools is managed with privacy considerations, supported by comprehensive privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by publishing dedicated security and incident response documentation and implementing security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and preparedness.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Consider creating and hosting a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve trust with security researchers.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced via dependencies.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher standards, improving usability for all users.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Onninen AS
Registration number
NO 979 692 900
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Onninen AS
Description
Onninen er en av Nordens ledende elektro-grossister. Vi tilbyr over 100.000 varer innen elektro, med lynrask levering til entreprenører, prosjekter og industri. Nettbutikk og 26 express-butikker over hele Norge.
Key services
electrical product distribution, express stores, online webshop, customer service for energy utilities
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, YouTube iframe API, Dynatrace Ruxit agent
Frameworks
React
Platforms
Contentful CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with proper labels and autocomplete off for email input

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection or registry policy.
  3. Website uses modern web technologies and integrates analytics and marketing tools.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented with official company emails and phone numbers.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present and appear comprehensive and GDPR compliant.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies found on the site.
  7. Social media presence on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Instagram supports brand trust.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected in the HTML or scripts.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including React for frontend rendering and Contentful as the CMS backend, enabling dynamic content management and scalability. Integration with Google Tag Manager and YouTube iframe API supports analytics and media content delivery. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO metadata and Open Graph tags for social sharing. Performance is moderate, with potential optimization opportunities in script loading and image delivery. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No hosting provider details were identified from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable online presence with room for performance and accessibility enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with onninen.no. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review onninen.no.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.