Skip to main content

Security report for onemed.com

OneMed · Healthcare · Sweden

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

OneMed is a Swedish healthcare supplier specializing in medical devices, consumables, equipment, and related services. The company targets healthcare providers in Sweden, offering a B2B model with multiple digital portals including a webshop and patient portals. The website reflects a well-established market position with a focus on quality, sustainability, and secure healthcare supply chain management. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks such as Bootstrap and Sitecore CMS, integrates multiple analytics and tracking services, and is hosted behind Cloudflare for performance and security. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, session management, and cookie consent mechanisms, though some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is robust with a comprehensive GDPR-aligned privacy policy and cookie consent banner. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and aligned with the company's business claims.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
63/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching onemed.com

This scan found 12 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
70
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
63
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

OneMed operates in the healthcare sector in Sweden, serving healthcare institutions with a broad product range and services. The company leverages digital platforms to enhance customer experience and operational efficiency. Its partnerships with analytics and consent management providers indicate a mature digital marketing and compliance strategy. The absence of terms of service and explicit incident response contacts suggests areas for improvement. The company appears medium-sized with a clear focus on sustainability and quality, positioning itself as a reliable healthcare partner.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of anti-CSRF tokens, and a detailed cookie consent mechanism. Third-party integrations are managed with privacy policies linked. However, explicit security headers like X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options are not visible in the HTML source and should be verified server-side. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Incident response information is not prominently provided, which could be enhanced to improve security readiness and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against clickjacking and MIME sniffing.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  3. Add a clearly visible incident response contact or abuse email to improve security communication.
  4. Consider adding a terms of service page to clarify user agreements and legal terms.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and cookies to ensure ongoing compliance and security.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
OneMed
Description
OneMed Sverige täcker hälso- och sjukvårdens behov när det kommer till medicinskt material, utrustning och beredskap - snabbt, smidigt och med kvalitet. Driven av trygg och säker vård samt förbättrad livskvalitet. Strävar efter rättvis och hållbar värdekedja.
Key services
Medicintekniska produkter, Förbrukningsmaterial, Utrustning, Tjänster, Webshop, Guide, Vårdtagarportalen, Totalförsvar
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Microsoft ASP.NET, Sitecore, Cloudflare, New Relic, Cookie Information, Ontame.io, Talentech
Frameworks
Bootstrap, ASP.NET, Sitecore
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of session cookies with appropriate expiry
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security tokens (__RequestVerificationToken)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Azure Analytics, Ontame.io, New Relic
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Ontame.io, New Relic
Marketing tools
Ontame.io
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented with detailed cookie categories
  3. Privacy policy is detailed and GDPR compliant
  4. Contact information including phone and email clearly provided
  5. Use of multiple third-party analytics and tracking services with consent
  6. No terms of service page found
  7. Security best practices mostly followed but some security headers not explicitly visible
  8. Website uses modern technologies and CMS (Sitecore)
  9. Mobile optimized and accessible
  10. No suspicious or malicious indicators detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern tech stack including Sitecore CMS, Bootstrap framework, and ASP.NET backend. It uses Cloudflare for CDN and security, and integrates multiple analytics platforms such as Google Analytics, Microsoft Azure Analytics, Ontame.io, and New Relic for performance monitoring. The site is mobile responsive and accessible with good SEO metadata and Open Graph tags. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by multiple third-party scripts. The cookie consent mechanism is robust and user-friendly. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party services which require continuous monitoring for vulnerabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with onemed.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review onemed.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.