Skip to main content

Security report for onclive.com

MJH Life Sciences · Healthcare · United States

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

OncLive is a specialized media platform focused on clinical oncology news and expert insights, operated by MJH Life Sciences. The website targets oncology professionals and healthcare providers, offering multimedia content including interviews and news updates. The platform holds a solid market position within the oncology information niche, founded in 2009 and based in the United States. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript libraries, analytics tools like Segment and Google Analytics, and consent management via OneTrust, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS, implements key security headers, and manages user consent effectively, though it lacks a dedicated security policy or incident response page. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with privacy regulations, though the absence of WHOIS data slightly impacts domain trustworthiness. Strategic recommendations include publishing security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure information to enhance transparency and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching onclive.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the healthcare sector, specifically oncology media and information services. Its revenue model likely includes advertising and sponsored content, supported by partnerships with ad networks like Google DoubleClick and marketing tools such as HubSpot. The target audience is specialized, focusing on oncology professionals, which positions OncLive as a niche authoritative source. The company benefits from a consistent brand presence and active social media engagement. Growth indicators include the use of advanced analytics and consent management, suggesting attention to regulatory compliance and user experience. No direct subsidiaries or partner domains were identified from the data provided.

Security posture

OncLive demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforcement and comprehensive security headers. The presence of consent management tools indicates GDPR compliance efforts. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analysis. However, the absence of a public security policy, incident response contact, or vulnerability disclosure mechanism represents a compliance and transparency gap. The site would benefit from formalizing these aspects to improve incident readiness and user trust. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced with additional documentation and proactive disclosure.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Establish and publicize an incident response contact or page for reporting security issues.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
MJH Life Sciences
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MJH Life Sciences
Description
OncLive serves as the connection to oncology, including groundbreaking cancer news and interviews with top oncologists in multimedia formats.
Key services
clinical oncology news, expert interviews, multimedia oncology content
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Segment Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot, OneTrust, Lightbox
Frameworks
basicLightbox
Platforms
web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • Consent management implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Segment Analytics, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick, DoubleVerify
Tracking pixels
HubSpot Ads Pixel
Marketing tools
Segment Analytics, HubSpot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content.
  2. No WHOIS data available, possibly due to privacy or registry issues.
  3. Strong privacy and cookie policy presence with consent management.
  4. Use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools.
  5. Good security headers and HTTPS enforcement.
  6. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
  7. No incident response or security policy pages found.
  8. Business information is clear and consistent with healthcare oncology focus.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including JavaScript libraries for UI components (basicLightbox), analytics (Segment, Google Analytics), marketing (HubSpot), and consent management (OneTrust). The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO practices including meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, with multiple external scripts that may impact load times. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The site shows no critical technical debt but could improve accessibility and performance optimization. The use of multiple third-party services requires ongoing security monitoring to prevent supply chain risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with onclive.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review onclive.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.