Skip to main content

Security report for omicronenergy.com

OMICRON · Energy · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

OMICRON is a company specializing in innovative power system testing solutions, targeting power system engineers and utility companies. The website serves primarily as a multilingual redirect hub to localized subpages, with minimal content on the root domain. The business model focuses on providing diagnostic equipment and software for electrical power systems. The company appears to be a medium-sized entity in the energy sector with consistent branding but limited publicly available business details on the root page. Technically, the website uses TYPO3 CMS and integrates multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Hotjar, Matomo, and Calendly. Despite a well-implemented Content Security Policy and security headers, the site lacks a valid SSL certificate and does not support HTTPS, which is a critical security deficiency. Performance data is unavailable, but the minimal content suggests slow or incomplete loading metrics. From a security perspective, the absence of HTTPS and TLS protocols severely impacts the security posture. While security headers like HSTS and CSP are present, their effectiveness is undermined by the lack of encryption. No privacy or cookie policies were found, indicating poor privacy compliance. No contact or incident response information is available, limiting transparency and trust. Overall, the website presents significant risks due to missing HTTPS and privacy compliance, minimal content, and lack of contact information. Strategic improvements in SSL deployment, privacy policy publication, and content enrichment are recommended to enhance trust, security, and user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
15/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching omicronenergy.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
55
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
15
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

OMICRON operates in the energy sector, providing specialized power system testing solutions. The company targets professional clients such as utility companies and engineers. The business model is B2B, focusing on technology and diagnostic services. The website's multilingual setup indicates a global or multi-regional market presence. However, the root domain lacks detailed business information, contact data, or certifications, which limits transparency. The company uses a range of marketing and analytics tools to monitor and optimize user engagement. The DNS setup and domain registration are consistent and professional, supporting legitimacy. No partnerships or subsidiaries are explicitly identified from the data provided.

Security posture

The security posture is weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of HTTPS support, which is critical for protecting data in transit. Although security headers such as HSTS, CSP, and X-Content-Type-Options are implemented, their benefits are limited without encryption. No vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or POODLE were detected, but the lack of TLS protocols and session resumption mechanisms indicates outdated or incomplete security configuration. No privacy or incident response policies are published, and no security certifications are evident. The extensive use of third-party tracking scripts raises privacy concerns, especially without clear cookie consent mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across all domains and subdomains.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements and implement a consent mechanism.
  3. Enhance website content with clear business information, contact details, and security or incident response policies to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Review and update Content Security Policy to minimize use of unsafe-inline and unsafe-eval directives.
  5. Implement security.txt and vulnerability disclosure pages to facilitate responsible security communication.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on TYPO3 CMS and uses a variety of JavaScript libraries and third-party services including Google Analytics, Hotjar, Matomo, Calendly, and Braintree Gateway. The Content Security Policy is comprehensive, allowing many trusted domains but also includes unsafe-inline and unsafe-eval which could be improved. The server uses PWS/8.3.1.0.8 and the DNS setup is professional with multiple TXT records for verification and SPF. However, the SSL/TLS configuration is absent or invalid, with no supported TLS versions or cipher suites detected. Performance metrics are missing, but the minimal HTML content suggests low resource usage. The site lacks accessibility and SEO optimizations based on the limited metadata and content. Hosting provider details are not explicit but IP address suggests private or dedicated hosting.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with omicronenergy.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review omicronenergy.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.