Skip to main content

Security report for ombudsmanprozdravi.cz

Kancelář Ombudsmana pro zdraví, z. s. · Healthcare · Czech Republic

High risk. 14 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 4 other checks.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website represents Kancelář Ombudsmana pro zdraví, a Czech non-profit organization providing free legal advice and support related to healthcare rights. Established in 2014, it has built a recognized presence in the Czech healthcare sector, offering services such as complaint handling, educational seminars, and legal internships. The organization targets patients, healthcare professionals, and legal students, aiming to improve awareness and protection of healthcare rights. Technically, the website is built on WordPress 4.9.28 with Gantry 5 framework and uses plugins like Smart Slider 3 and MonsterInsights for analytics. While HTTPS is enforced, the site uses outdated core software and libraries, lacks advanced security headers, and does not publish privacy or cookie policies, indicating moderate digital maturity. Security posture is moderate with enforced HTTPS but missing security headers and outdated software increasing risk. No incident response or security policy information is published. WHOIS data is unavailable, which reduces domain trustworthiness, though the website content and business presence suggest legitimacy. Overall, the site is functional and informative but requires updates to software, security practices, and privacy compliance to improve trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

14 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ombudsmanprozdravi.cz

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ombudsmanprozdravi.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for ombudsmanprozdravi.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates as a small non-profit focused on healthcare legal advisory services in the Czech Republic. It has established partnerships with multiple healthcare and legal organizations, enhancing its credibility and reach. The business model centers on free advisory services, education, and advocacy, supported by donations and grants. The website content and partner logos indicate a well-connected ecosystem. Growth indicators include media presence and student internship programs. Revenue streams likely include donations and grants, as indicated by a donation account number. The organization faces challenges in funding continuity, as noted in the founder's message about pausing activities due to financial constraints.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, which is a fundamental security measure. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection, which are critical for mitigating common web attacks. The use of outdated WordPress and jQuery versions exposes the site to known vulnerabilities. No visible security or incident response policies are published, and no dedicated security contact channels are provided. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires urgent updates and policy publication to reduce risk and improve compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Update WordPress core and all plugins to the latest supported versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details and implement a cookie consent mechanism.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response policy and provide dedicated security contact channels.
  5. Improve website technical stack by upgrading jQuery and other libraries, and enhance mobile optimization and accessibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Kancelář Ombudsmana pro zdraví, z. s.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Kancelář Ombudsmana pro zdraví, z. s.
Description
Non-profit organization providing free legal advice and support related to healthcare rights in the Czech Republic. The office has helped thousands of people with complaints and inquiries about healthcare since 2014.
Key services
Free legal advice on healthcare rights, Educational seminars and lectures, Publishing manuals and brochures, Student internships and legal practice, Handling complaints and inquiries
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress 4.9.28, PHP, jQuery 1.12.4, Smart Slider 3, Gantry 5 Framework, Google Analytics, MonsterInsights plugin
Frameworks
Gantry 5
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced via script redirect

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Leady
Marketing tools
MonsterInsights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a non-profit healthcare ombudsman service in Czech Republic
  2. Content is in Czech language and well structured
  3. No privacy or cookie policy pages found
  4. Uses outdated WordPress and jQuery versions
  5. HTTPS enforced but no advanced security headers detected
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, raising some legitimacy concerns
  7. Contact info clearly provided with email, phone, and physical address
  8. No signs of adult or unsafe content
  9. Google Analytics and Leady tracking scripts present
  10. No visible forms collecting personal data on homepage
Technical notes

Notes

The website runs on an older WordPress version (4.9.28) with Gantry 5 framework and uses jQuery 1.12.4, which is outdated and may pose security risks. It employs Smart Slider 3 for visual content and MonsterInsights for Google Analytics integration. HTTPS is enforced via a JavaScript redirect, ensuring encrypted communication. The site shows moderate performance and basic mobile responsiveness. SEO and accessibility features are basic but present. The technical debt from outdated software and missing security headers represents a risk to business continuity and user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ombudsmanprozdravi.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ombudsmanprozdravi.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.