Skip to main content

Security report for olympic-casino.lv

Olympic Casino Latvia · Hospitality · Latvia

Partial score · DNS & email only

52/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Olympic Casino Latvia operates as a casino and entertainment service provider targeting adult customers interested in gambling within Latvia. The website presents a professional design with consistent branding and uses modern web technologies including Cookiebot for cookie consent management and Google Fonts for typography. The technical infrastructure appears moderately optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness, though no CMS or hosting provider details are explicitly identified. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented; however, the absence of visible security headers and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts indicate room for improvement. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site is functional and trustworthy for its business domain but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security practices.

Scanned

4 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
3of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching olympic-casino.lv

This scan found 9 issues across 2 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

Security headers
15
GDPR outside view
88
Average
52

Not counted

  • SSL/TLS: did not complete in this scan.
  • Email security: did not complete in this scan.
  • DNS health: did not complete in this scan.
  • Network security: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Olympic Casino Latvia is positioned as a significant player in the hospitality sector focused on casino gaming in Latvia. The business model revolves around providing casino entertainment services to adult clientele. The website content and metadata confirm the target audience and business focus. The company appears to maintain consistent branding and a professional online presence. However, the lack of explicit contact information, privacy policies, and terms of service on the site may affect customer trust and regulatory compliance. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content. The use of Cookiebot suggests awareness of privacy regulations, though full compliance documentation is not evident.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, which is a fundamental security requirement. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, indicating some level of privacy compliance. However, no security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), or X-Frame-Options were detected in the provided data, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. There is no visible security policy, incident response information, or vulnerability disclosure mechanism published on the site. The absence of contact channels for security incidents and lack of WHOIS data further limit the ability to assess domain legitimacy and security maturity. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to enhance regulatory compliance and user trust.
  2. Add standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to improve protection against common web attacks.
  3. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security-related inquiries.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response plan, including a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure guidelines.
  5. Obtain and verify WHOIS data to ensure domain registration transparency and legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Olympic Casino Latvia
Description
Olympic Casino Latvia is a hospitality and gaming business offering casino services in Latvia.
Key services
Casino gaming, Entertainment
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Cookiebot, Google Fonts (Oswald, Montserrat), Swiper.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism implemented via Cookiebot.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found in provided HTML.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  6. Website uses HTTPS and modern fonts and JavaScript libraries.
  7. Content is focused on casino and gambling services in Latvia.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  10. No social media links explicitly found in the HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses modern front-end technologies including JavaScript libraries such as Swiper.js for UI components and Google Fonts for typography. Cookiebot is integrated for cookie consent management, indicating attention to privacy compliance. The site is mobile responsive and uses HTTPS, contributing to a secure and accessible user experience. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is evident, and no advanced frameworks are detected. Performance appears moderate with no explicit indicators of optimization or technical debt. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO optimization is minimal but present via meta tags and Open Graph data. The absence of security headers and WHOIS data limits the overall technical security assessment.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with olympic-casino.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review olympic-casino.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.