Skip to main content

Security report for olpha.lv

Akciju sabiedrība “Olpha” · Healthcare · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Olpha is a leading pharmaceutical manufacturer based in Latvia, serving over 60 markets with a broad portfolio of pharmaceutical products, active ingredients, and nutritional supplements. The company operates through multiple subsidiaries across Eastern Europe and Central Asia, emphasizing contract manufacturing and pharmaceutical co-development. Their website reflects a mature digital presence with multilingual support, professional design, and a strong focus on accessibility, ensuring compliance with WCAG 2.1 AA standards. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and tracking tools, although performance could be improved due to high resource count and page size. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and modern TLS protocols, but lacks some advanced configurations such as HSTS, DNSSEC, and DMARC, which are recommended for enhanced protection. Privacy compliance is strong with clear policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, Olpha presents a trustworthy and professional online presence aligned with its business stature.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching olpha.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
95
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Olpha holds a strong market position as a regional leader in pharmaceutical manufacturing with over 50 years of experience. Their business model focuses on diversified pharmaceutical production services including contract manufacturing, licensing, and nutritional supplement production. The company targets healthcare professionals, business partners, and patients, supported by a comprehensive product portfolio and active participation in social responsibility initiatives. Their extensive subsidiary network across multiple countries supports broad market reach. The website's content and structure indicate a well-established brand with consistent messaging and strong trust signals such as social media presence and accessibility compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of TLS 1.3 and 1.2 protocols. No critical SSL vulnerabilities were detected. However, the absence of HSTS, DNSSEC, CAA, and DMARC records represents gaps in security best practices. The lack of domain protection locks in WHOIS data is a minor risk for domain hijacking. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are publicly available, which could be improved to enhance security culture and transparency. Accessibility features and secure form handling are positive indicators. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from implementing recommended enhancements.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload to prevent protocol downgrade attacks.
  2. Implement DNSSEC and CAA records to protect DNS integrity and restrict certificate issuance.
  3. Publish and enforce a DMARC record to improve email security and reduce phishing risks.
  4. Activate OCSP stapling to improve SSL certificate revocation checking performance and security.
  5. Enable domain protection locks to prevent unauthorized domain transfers and enhance domain security.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Akciju sabiedrība “Olpha”
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform with a comprehensive set of plugins for SEO, multilingual support, accessibility, and marketing integrations. The tech stack includes Yoast SEO, WPML, Contact Form 7, Mailchimp, and Readabler for accessibility. The site uses Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. Performance is impacted by a large number of resources (258) and a large page size (~815 KB), resulting in slow load times (~14.4 seconds). Accessibility is a strong focus with advanced features and compliance to WCAG 2.1 AA. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified but the IP address is Latvian. Overall, the technical infrastructure is robust but could be optimized for performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with olpha.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review olpha.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.