Skip to main content

Security report for olova.lv

Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.olova.lv represents a small Latvian retail clothing business offering apparel for everyday use. The site is built on the Mozello CMS platform and hosted via Amazon Cloudfront CDN, utilizing common web technologies such as jQuery and Google Analytics for tracking. The business targets Latvian-speaking customers with a basic e-commerce model including an online store and delivery information. Privacy and cookie policies are present, indicating some level of compliance with GDPR requirements. However, no explicit contact information or company legal details are provided on the site, which limits business transparency. From a technical perspective, the website employs standard web technologies and is mobile optimized with moderate performance. The security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, but lacks advanced security headers and visible protections on login forms. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts the ability to fully verify domain legitimacy and registrant information, which impacts trust assessment. Overall, the site is functional and safe for general audiences, with no adult or explicit content detected. The security and privacy compliance are basic but could be improved by adding security headers, enhancing login security, and providing clearer business contact information. The lack of WHOIS data and limited business transparency are notable gaps that should be addressed to improve credibility and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching olova.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention olova.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for olova.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the retail clothing sector within Latvia, focusing on everyday apparel. Its business model is primarily e-commerce with an online store and delivery services. The website's market position appears to be local and small scale, targeting Latvian consumers. The use of Mozello CMS and Amazon Cloudfront indicates a cost-effective hosting and platform choice suitable for small businesses. The absence of detailed company information, certifications, or partnerships suggests a modest operational scale. Marketing efforts include Google Analytics and Engaga tracking, but no affiliate or retargeting programs are evident. Growth potential may be limited by the lack of visible trust signals and contact transparency.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and includes a cookie consent mechanism, which are positive security and privacy practices. However, the absence of HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. The login form is present but lacks visible brute force protections like CAPTCHA or rate limiting. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policies are found, indicating limited incident response readiness. The use of third-party libraries like jQuery 2.2.4 may pose risks if not regularly updated. Overall, the security posture is basic and could benefit from enhancements to headers, login security, and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against web attacks.
  2. Add CAPTCHA or rate limiting on login forms to mitigate brute force attack risks.
  3. Provide clear and accessible business contact information including emails and phone numbers to enhance trust and compliance.
  4. Publish a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve incident response and transparency.
  5. Regularly update all third-party libraries and dependencies to reduce exposure to known vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
OLOVA offers clothing for everyday use, targeting Latvian-speaking customers.
Key services
Online clothing store, Delivery information, Customer contact
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.2.4, Fancybox3, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Mozello platform, Cloudfront CDN
Platforms
Mozello
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • Secure login form with password field

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Engaga
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Engaga
Marketing tools
Engaga
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error, limiting domain trust assessment.
  3. Site uses Mozello CMS hosted on Amazon Cloudfront CDN.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and linked.
  5. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on main pages.
  6. Login form present but no visible advanced security controls.
  7. Site uses Google Analytics and other tracking scripts with cookie consent banner.
  8. Content is in Latvian language targeting local customers.
  9. No social media links or company legal info found in HTML content.
  10. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Mozello CMS platform and hosted on Amazon Cloudfront CDN, leveraging jQuery 2.2.4 and Fancybox3 for UI components. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for analytics tracking, alongside Engaga for marketing engagement. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and basic accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected in the HTML structure. SEO optimization is basic with canonical tags and meta viewport settings present. However, the absence of advanced security headers and limited business metadata reduces the overall technical robustness. The site would benefit from modernization of libraries and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with olova.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review olova.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.