Skip to main content

Security report for olo.cool

Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf · Media · Iceland

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Olo.cool operates as an adult content aggregator website providing free pornographic videos sourced from various partner sites. The business model relies heavily on advertising and affiliate marketing within the adult entertainment sector. The website targets an adult-only audience with explicit content and multiple language support to reach a global user base. Technically, the site uses standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and jQuery, with Google Tag Manager for analytics and Cloudflare for DNS services. The site performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is average; HTTPS is enabled but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC. Privacy compliance is minimal with no explicit cookie consent mechanisms despite tracking scripts. The domain is privacy protected, typical for adult sites, and was registered in 2019, consistent with the business age. Overall, the site is functional but lacks robust privacy and security practices, and its trustworthiness is moderate due to the nature of content and limited transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching olo.cool

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website occupies a niche in the adult entertainment market as a free video aggregator, leveraging affiliate partnerships with multiple adult sites to monetize traffic. Its multilingual support indicates a strategy to capture diverse international audiences. The business model is primarily advertising-driven, with popunder ads and affiliate links. The domain's privacy protection and lack of detailed company information are common in this sector to protect operator anonymity. The site shows moderate branding consistency but limited trust signals beyond basic compliance links. Growth potential depends on traffic volume and affiliate conversions. The partner ecosystem is extensive, linking to many adult content providers, indicating a broad network but also potential exposure to suspicious domains.

Security posture

Security maturity is basic. The site uses HTTPS but lacks DNSSEC and important security headers such as Content Security Policy and HSTS. The presence of intrusive advertising scripts and popunders may expose users to security risks. No visible vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies are found, though an abuse report form exists. Privacy compliance is weak, with no cookie consent banners despite tracking. The domain's privacy protection is justified given the adult content nature but reduces transparency. Overall, the site is vulnerable to common web threats and could improve security hygiene significantly.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC and implement comprehensive security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options).
  2. Introduce clear and accessible privacy and cookie policies with explicit consent mechanisms.
  3. Audit and reduce intrusive advertising scripts to improve user security and experience.
  4. Establish a formal vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact channels.
  5. Enhance transparency by providing more detailed business and contact information.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf
Description
Free pornographic video content aggregator offering adult videos and clips from various sources.
Key services
Adult video streaming, Video categorization and sorting, Affiliate linking to partner adult sites
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
RealSrv
Marketing tools
jQuery Autocomplete
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content aggregator with explicit pornographic videos.
  2. No visible privacy or cookie consent banners despite tracking scripts.
  3. Use of multiple external adult affiliate sites and ad networks.
  4. Domain uses privacy protection and Cloudflare DNS but lacks DNSSEC.
  5. Contains an abuse report form but no detailed security or privacy policies.
  6. Advertising scripts include popunder and potentially intrusive ads.
  7. No visible social media or company contact emails or phone numbers.
  8. Website content is accessible without WAF or security challenges.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a traditional web stack with HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, including jQuery and Google Tag Manager for analytics. It uses Cloudflare for DNS but does not enable DNSSEC, which is a missed security opportunity. The site loads multiple external resources, including ad networks and affiliate links, which may impact performance and security. Mobile optimization is adequate but accessibility features are minimal. SEO is basic with meta tags and alternate language links but lacks advanced structured data or Open Graph tags. The site uses client-side scripts for video sorting and lazy loading, indicating moderate technical sophistication but also potential technical debt in ad management and privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with olo.cool. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review olo.cool.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.