Oliver Kinross Ltd. is a professional event organization company specializing in award-winning global conferences, exhibitions, and online events focused on the built environment and construction industry. They operate large-scale trade shows in major cities including London, New York, Chicago, Sydney, and Melbourne, positioning themselves as market leaders in this niche. Their services emphasize content-led shows with accredited conferences and workshops, facilitating business networking and government engagement. The company maintains a medium-sized business profile with a consistent and professional brand presence.
Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies such as jQuery, FontAwesome, and a proprietary CMS platform (SHOWOFF by ASP.events). The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and integrates analytics via Piwik/Matomo. Cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policies are implemented, reflecting a good level of digital maturity and privacy compliance. Performance is moderate with good SEO and accessibility features.
From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and secure form handling but lacks visible security headers and explicit security or incident response policies. The absence of WHOIS registration data for the domain is a notable concern, potentially indicating privacy protection or domain registration issues, which impacts trustworthiness. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected.
Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy front for a specialized event business but should address domain registration transparency and enhance security policies publicly. Strategic recommendations include improving security headers, validating legal links, and publishing incident response and vulnerability disclosure information to strengthen trust and compliance.
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Email security
SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.
Critical
No email authentication configured
Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing
What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately
High
No SPF record found
SPF helps prevent email spoofing
What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing X-Frame-Options header
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
40
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
62
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention oliver-kinross.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for oliver-kinross.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Oliver Kinross operates in the event organization sector with a focus on construction and built environment trade shows. Their competitive advantage lies in hosting the largest construction events in iconic venues worldwide, supported by government endorsements and a strong portfolio. Revenue streams likely include exhibitor fees, sponsorships, and attendee registrations. The target customers are industry professionals, government delegates, and exhibitors. Growth indicators include expanding global presence and government support. The company ecosystem includes a subsidiary in Asia Pacific. Strategic observations suggest a well-established brand with opportunities to enhance digital trust and security transparency.
Security posture
The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and secure form inputs. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of publicly available security or incident response policies indicate room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. The missing WHOIS data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and transparency. Compliance with GDPR is indicated by cookie consent and privacy policy presence, but explicit incident response contacts are missing. Overall, the security maturity is adequate but could be enhanced by formalizing policies and improving domain registration transparency.
Recommendations
Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
Validate and publish a functional Terms & Conditions page to improve legal compliance and user trust.
Publish explicit security and incident response policies including contact channels for reporting vulnerabilities or abuse.
Verify domain registration status and ensure WHOIS data is accurate and publicly accessible to enhance legitimacy and trust.
Enhance transparency around data protection by appointing and publishing Data Protection Officer contact details if applicable.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
Oliver Kinross Ltd.
Description
Oliver Kinross organise award-winning global conferences, exhibitions and online events for the built environment. Their portfolio includes market-leading and large-scale construction events in London, New York, Chicago, The Midwest, Sydney and Melbourne.
Key services
Global conferences, Exhibitions, Online events, Business networking, Workshops and accredited conferences
Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
Professional event organization business with global presence
Good use of modern web technologies and analytics
Cookie consent and privacy policy implemented
WHOIS data missing or domain unregistered, which is unusual
No explicit security policies or incident response info publicly available
Contact information is clear and includes phone, address, and contact form
Footer contains multiple office locations including London and Hong Kong
No social media links explicitly found in HTML content
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built on the SHOWOFF CMS platform by ASP.events, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and scriptjs, and styled with Google Fonts and FontAwesome icons. It integrates Piwik/Matomo for analytics and CookieYes for consent management. The site is mobile responsive and accessible with good SEO metadata and Open Graph tags. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and use of CDN-hosted assets. Technical risks are minimal but could be reduced by updating and hardening security headers and ensuring all external links are valid and secure.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with oliver-kinross.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review oliver-kinross.com.