Skip to main content

Security report for oliver.agency

OLIVER · Media · United Kingdom

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

OLIVER is a pioneering marketing agency specializing in building bespoke in-house marketing teams and ecosystems for brands globally. With a unique business model that challenges traditional agency-client relationships, OLIVER offers clients enhanced efficiency and creative effectiveness, delivering significant marketing spend savings. The company has a strong global presence with offices across multiple continents and is recognized with numerous industry awards, underscoring its market leadership and innovation. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and technologies, providing a professional and responsive user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is well addressed with comprehensive policies and GDPR adherence. Overall, OLIVER presents a credible, professional, and trustworthy digital presence aligned with its business stature.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching oliver.agency

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
60
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

OLIVER operates in the media sector, targeting brands seeking to internalize their marketing functions through in-house agencies. Its competitive advantage lies in its exclusive model and global network, supported by partnerships such as The Brandtech Group. The business model focuses on operational efficiency and creative innovation, with a strong emphasis on sustainability and diversity. Revenue streams likely include agency services, technology licensing (Oliver Marketing Gateway), and consultancy. The company demonstrates growth through awards and new partnerships, such as with easyJet. The strategic ecosystem includes global offices and digital marketing tools, positioning OLIVER as a leader in in-house marketing solutions.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not detected, representing an area for enhancement. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is publicly available, which could be improved to increase transparency and readiness. The use of reputable third-party plugins and analytics tools is noted, with no known vulnerabilities detected. Overall, the security maturity is good but could benefit from formalized policies and additional header implementations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program, potentially via a security.txt file.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party plugins and scripts to minimize vulnerability risks.
  5. Enhance website accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards and improve user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
OLIVER
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
OLIVER
Description
Oliver are the world's first and only advertising company to build in-house marketing teams and ecosystems. Your very own in house media agency.
Key services
In-house marketing teams, Marketing ecosystems, Creative work, Marketing spend efficiency
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Weglot (translation), Allow WebP Image plugin, WebToffee GDPR Cookie Consent plugin, If-So Dynamic Content plugin
Frameworks
Enfold WordPress Theme
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Universal Analytics, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense
Tracking pixels
HubSpot
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. Strong global presence with multiple office locations and contact details
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms
  4. No visible security or privacy policy documents beyond privacy and cookie policies
  5. No explicit terms of service or incident response contacts found
  6. Use of modern web technologies and WordPress CMS
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
  8. WHOIS data is unavailable or malformed, indicating privacy protection or registry limitations
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Enfold theme and several plugins for GDPR compliance, multilingual support (Weglot), and marketing analytics (Google Tag Manager, HubSpot). The tech stack is modern and well-integrated, supporting responsive design and good SEO practices. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. The site uses standard JavaScript libraries like jQuery and implements lazy loading for images. Hosting provider details are not explicit. Technical risks are minimal but include potential plugin vulnerabilities and missing security headers. Overall, the infrastructure supports the business needs effectively with opportunities for further modernization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with oliver.agency. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review oliver.agency.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.