Skip to main content

Security report for olgaele-stiftung.de

Olgäle-Stiftung für das kranke Kind e.V. · Healthcare · Germany

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Olgäle-Stiftung für das kranke Kind e.V. is a well-established non-profit foundation based in Stuttgart, Germany, dedicated to supporting sick children and their families, primarily through assistance to the Olgahospital. The foundation operates through donations, memberships, and fundraising campaigns, positioning itself as a trusted regional healthcare supporter. The website reflects this mission with clear content, professional design, and consistent branding aimed at donors, parents, and healthcare stakeholders. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins for SEO, cookie consent, and newsletter management, indicating a moderate to advanced digital maturity. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, Content-Security-Policy headers, and no visible vulnerabilities, though additional security headers and incident response information could enhance trust. Privacy compliance is robust with a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. Overall, the site is trustworthy, professional, and well-suited to its audience and mission.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching olgaele-stiftung.de

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention olgaele-stiftung.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for olgaele-stiftung.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The foundation holds a solid market position as a specialized non-profit in pediatric healthcare support. Its business model relies on donations and community engagement, supported by transparent contact information and active social media presence. The integration of external partners like Altruja for donations and Rapidmail for newsletters indicates a mature partnership ecosystem. Growth indicators include active news updates and events. The foundation's operations are focused on healthcare and social welfare sectors, targeting parents, donors, and healthcare professionals. The website's content and structure support these goals effectively, though expansion of security and compliance disclosures could improve stakeholder confidence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS, a Content-Security-Policy header, and secure form handling via Contact Form 7. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the absence of additional security headers such as Strict-Transport-Security and X-Frame-Options, and lack of explicit incident response or security contact information, represent areas for improvement. GDPR compliance is evident, but incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure policies are missing. Overall, the security posture is solid for a non-profit but could be enhanced to meet higher assurance levels.

Recommendations

  1. Implement additional HTTP security headers including Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen defense against common web attacks.
  2. Add a dedicated security or incident response page with contact channels for reporting vulnerabilities or incidents.
  3. Regularly audit and update all WordPress plugins and core to mitigate risks from outdated components.
  4. Enhance form input validation and implement CAPTCHA or anti-bot measures to prevent abuse.
  5. Maintain transparency by publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy and data protection officer contact information.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Olgäle-Stiftung für das kranke Kind e.V.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Olgäle-Stiftung für das kranke Kind e.V.
Description
Die im November 1997 gegründete Olgäle-Stiftung für das kranke Kind e.V hat sich zum Ziel gesetzt, kranken Kindern und ihren Eltern zu helfen. Die Hilfe gilt vor allem dem Kinderkranken­haus Olgahospital, dem Olgäle, in Stuttgart.
Key services
Supporting Olgahospital Stuttgart, Funding medical devices, Psychosocial care, Child-friendly hospital environment, Research and teaching support, Fundraising and donation campaigns
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.2.8, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery 3.6.4, Pixelmate cookie consent, Rapidmail newsletter integration, Contact Form 7
Frameworks
empty framework 2.6
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content-Security-Policy header present
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (UA-156937318-1)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Rapidmail newsletter, Pixelmate cookie consent
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally maintained non-profit foundation site.
  2. Clear focus on pediatric healthcare support in Stuttgart, Germany.
  3. Good privacy and cookie compliance with explicit consent mechanisms.
  4. Use of modern CMS and plugins with SEO optimization.
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
  6. Contact information is complete and transparent.
  7. No terms of service page found.
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response information available.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.2.8 using the empty framework 2.6 and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a modern and SEO-optimized infrastructure. It uses jQuery 3.6.4 and integrates third-party services such as Rapidmail for newsletters and Altruja for donations. The site loads scripts asynchronously and uses a Content-Security-Policy header, reflecting good security hygiene. Performance is moderate with responsive design and mobile optimization. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The technical stack is well-maintained with opportunities to enhance security headers and incident response capabilities to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with olgaele-stiftung.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review olgaele-stiftung.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.