Skip to main content

Security report for oley.org

The Oley Foundation · Healthcare · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Oley Foundation is a well-established non-profit organization focused on supporting individuals living with home IV nutrition and tube feeding. Their website serves as a comprehensive resource offering advocacy, education, community engagement, and events tailored to patients, caregivers, clinicians, and industry partners. The organization has a strong market position as a trusted leader in this niche healthcare sector, supported by a long domain history and recognized certifications such as the Candid Platinum Seal. Technically, the website is built on the YourMembership CMS platform and leverages a variety of modern web technologies including jQuery, YUI, Google Analytics, New Relic for performance monitoring, and DataDome for bot protection. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and user experience, though there is room for improvement in accessibility and SEO practices. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs bot mitigation tools, but lacks some advanced security headers and a public vulnerability disclosure policy. The WHOIS data aligns well with the organization's identity and history, reinforcing legitimacy. Privacy compliance is basic with a visible cookie consent mechanism and a privacy policy, but GDPR compliance is not explicitly indicated. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy digital presence with moderate technical sophistication and a solid security baseline. Strategic enhancements in security headers, incident response transparency, and privacy compliance would further strengthen their posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching oley.org

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention oley.org, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
23
Employees
0
Customers
23
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
9%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for oley.org.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Oley Foundation operates in the healthcare non-profit sector, targeting a specialized community of patients requiring home IV nutrition and tube feeding. Their business model centers on membership, advocacy, education, and community support, supplemented by events and an online store. The organization benefits from a strong reputation and long-standing presence since 2000, with partnerships including Guidestar and YourMembership. Their digital ecosystem supports community engagement and resource dissemination, positioning them as a key player in their niche. Revenue streams likely include membership fees, donations, event registrations, and merchandise sales. The foundation's strategic focus on education and advocacy provides competitive advantages in trust and community loyalty.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and bot protection via DataDome. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security.txt, and advanced HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options indicates gaps in defense-in-depth. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could hinder timely handling of security issues. The login form is secured with SSL, and no sensitive data exposure was detected in the HTML. Overall, while the site is reasonably secure for its purpose, implementing additional security best practices and transparency measures would enhance resilience and stakeholder confidence.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and vulnerability disclosure page to foster transparency and trust.
  4. Add incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and analytics tools to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
The Oley Foundation
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
The Oley Foundation
Description
Non-profit organization dedicated to enriching the lives of those living with home IV nutrition or tube feeding through advocacy, education, community, and innovation.
Key services
Advocacy, Education, Community support, Events and conferences, Research and scholarships, Online store, Resource library
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, YUI, Google Analytics, New Relic, Facebook SDK, Metricool tracker, DataDome bot protection
Frameworks
YourMembership CMS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Use of DataDome bot protection
  • Secure login form with SSL
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, New Relic, Metricool
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
New Relic, Metricool
Marketing tools
Metricool
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally maintained non-profit healthcare advocacy platform.
  2. Content is comprehensive and relevant to target audience of patients and caregivers.
  3. Use of multiple third-party analytics and tracking tools with basic privacy controls.
  4. Security posture is adequate but could be improved with additional headers and policies.
  5. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and long-term operation.
  6. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  7. Site uses YourMembership CMS platform and integrates social media and community features.
  8. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and visible.
  9. Contact information is clearly presented including phone, email, and physical addresses.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a mature CMS platform (YourMembership) combined with legacy and modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and YUI. Performance monitoring is handled by New Relic, and user analytics by Google Analytics and Metricool. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and has a clear navigation structure. However, some technical debt is evident in the use of older libraries (YUI) and lack of modern SEO and accessibility features. Hosting details are limited but the domain registrar is Network Solutions, LLC. The site could benefit from modernization efforts including updated frameworks, enhanced SEO metadata, and improved accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with oley.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review oley.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.