Skip to main content

Security report for olainfarm.com

Akciju sabiedrība “Olpha” · Healthcare · Latvia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Olpha is a well-established Latvian pharmaceutical company with over 50 years of experience and a strong regional presence across more than 60 markets. The company specializes in manufacturing a wide range of pharmaceutical products including active ingredients, finished dosage forms, and nutritional supplements. Their business model includes contract manufacturing and licensing, supported by a large team of specialists. The website reflects a mature digital presence with multilingual support, comprehensive accessibility features, and professional branding. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and integrates marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and no critical vulnerabilities detected, though improvements in email security and SSL configurations are recommended. Overall, Olpha demonstrates a credible and professional online presence aligned with its business stature.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching olainfarm.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
95
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention olainfarm.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
16
Employees
0
Customers
12
Third parties
4
Weak passwords
13%

4 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for olainfarm.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Olpha holds a leading position in the regional pharmaceutical manufacturing sector, leveraging a diversified product portfolio and extensive market reach. Their competitive advantage lies in their experienced workforce, broad therapeutic coverage, and integrated business services including contract manufacturing and product management. The company targets healthcare professionals, business partners, and consumers seeking quality pharmaceutical products. Growth indicators include active participation in social responsibility initiatives and continuous product development. The partnership ecosystem is evident through multiple regional domains and a strong social media footprint. Strategic observations highlight a focus on accessibility and digital maturity, supporting inclusive user engagement and compliance with regulatory standards.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with modern TLS protocols and shows no signs of common SSL vulnerabilities. DNS records include SPF and DMARC with a policy set to none, indicating room for improvement in email spoofing protection. No security.txt or explicit incident response policies are found, which could enhance transparency and readiness. Accessibility features are robust, supported by an AI-driven accessibility plugin, demonstrating a security-conscious approach to user inclusivity. The absence of HSTS and OCSP stapling reduces the overall SSL security effectiveness. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from enhanced email security policies and additional HTTP security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload to enforce HTTPS and prevent downgrade attacks.
  2. Enable OCSP stapling to improve SSL certificate revocation checking and reduce latency.
  3. Strengthen DMARC policy to quarantine or reject to mitigate email spoofing risks.
  4. Add CAA DNS records to restrict certificate issuance to authorized CAs.
  5. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Akciju sabiedrība “Olpha”
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress 6.8.1 with a suite of plugins including Yoast SEO for search optimization, WPML for multilingual support, Contact Form 7 for forms, and Readabler for accessibility enhancements. The tech stack is modern and well-integrated, supporting a multilingual and accessible user experience. Performance is suboptimal with a high load time (~19 seconds) and large page size (~867 KB), indicating potential for optimization in resource loading and caching. Hosting is via Cloudflare, providing DNS and CDN services. SEO is well-implemented with proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Accessibility is excellent, with multiple disability profiles supported and AI-based enhancements. Technical risks include slow performance and missing advanced security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with olainfarm.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review olainfarm.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.