Skip to main content

Security report for oilandgastour.com.mx

Damora Crane · Energy · Mexico

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Damora Crane Energy Tour 2025 is a niche event website focused on organizing and promoting a golf tournament for professionals in the energy sector in Mexico. The site targets energy industry participants and stakeholders, providing event information and fostering networking opportunities. The business model centers on event management and sector-specific engagement, positioning itself as a specialized platform within the energy industry. The website branding is moderately consistent, with basic content quality and limited trust indicators visible.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching oilandgastour.com.mx

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website serves a specialized market segment within the energy sector, leveraging event-based networking to build community and industry relationships. Its competitive advantage lies in its focused audience and sector relevance. Revenue streams likely include event sponsorships, registrations, and partnerships. The absence of detailed business information and contact data limits deeper business intelligence insights. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed, and no subsidiaries or parent companies are identified.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications, but lacks critical security headers that enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities. No explicit privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. The absence of vulnerability disclosure and incident response information suggests limited security transparency. Marketing and tracking scripts are present, but without clear privacy compliance mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements to meet best practices and regulatory standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to strengthen security posture.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident handling.
  4. Include clear and accessible contact information, including emails and phone numbers, to enhance business credibility and user trust.
  5. Regularly update all plugins and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain platform security.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Damora Crane
Description
El torneo de golf del sector energético
Key services
Golf tournament organization, Energy sector networking event
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, WooCommerce, Slider Revolution, jQuery, YouTube API, Sendinblue (Brevo) SDK
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Jetpack Stats
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
ProveSource, Jetpack (stats.wp.com)
Marketing tools
Sendinblue (Brevo) newsletter subscription
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an event site for a golf tournament in the energy sector in Mexico.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Uses WordPress with Elementor and WooCommerce plugins.
  4. Includes marketing and tracking scripts from Sendinblue and ProveSource.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided content.
  6. No security headers detected; HTTPS is enabled.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information present.
  8. Content is in Spanish and targeted at energy sector professionals.
  9. No adult or explicit content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using Elementor and WooCommerce, indicating a modern CMS with e-commerce capabilities. It integrates third-party marketing tools like Sendinblue and tracking services such as ProveSource and Jetpack Stats. Hosting appears to be provided by GoDaddy, inferred from plugin assets. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO optimization is basic, with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or rich snippets detected. Technical debt is moderate, with opportunities for modernization in security and compliance implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with oilandgastour.com.mx. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review oilandgastour.com.mx.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.