Skip to main content

Security report for oie-ag.de

OIE AG · Energy · Germany

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

OIE AG is a regional energy provider based in Germany, specializing in sustainable and renewable energy solutions including 100% green electricity, gas, and heat electricity tariffs. The company emphasizes regional engagement through initiatives like 'OIE Heimatliebe' and supports local projects in sports, culture, and climate protection. The website is professionally designed using Adobe Experience Manager and modern web technologies, with a focus on customer service and digital accessibility. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and consent management implemented, though explicit security policies and vulnerability disclosures are absent. Overall, the site reflects a trustworthy and credible regional energy business with moderate technical sophistication and good privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching oie-ag.de

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
55
Email security
98
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

OIE AG holds a strong regional market position as a pioneer in sustainable energy within the Birkenfeld and Kusel districts. Their business model centers on providing renewable energy products and personalized customer services, supported by digital tools like an embedded product finder and service portal. The company fosters community ties through sponsorships and social responsibility projects, enhancing brand loyalty. Their partnership ecosystem includes dedicated subdomains for news and customer cards, as well as a donation platform. Growth indicators include active digital engagement and multi-language support. The company targets private customers, business clients, and municipalities, positioning itself as a comprehensive regional energy partner.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of a reputable consent management platform (Usercentrics), and no visible exposure of sensitive data. Embedded forms are sandboxed via iframes, reducing risk. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and lack of a public security policy or incident response contact represent gaps. No known vulnerabilities or outdated libraries were detected in the provided content. The site uses Cloudflare for DNS and CDN, adding a layer of protection. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by publishing formal security documentation and improving header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the main navigation or footer.
  2. Implement and publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy to strengthen browser security.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and embedded content for security and privacy compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
OIE AG
Description
Als Pionier gestalten wir die nachhaltige Energiezukunft für den Landkreis Birkenfeld und Teile des Landkreises Kusel. 100% Ökostrom aus erneuerbaren Energien, Erdgas, Wärmestrom, persönliche Beratung und vieles mehr.
Key services
Electricity tariffs including 100% green energy, Gas tariffs, Heat electricity tariffs, Personal consultation, Customer service portal, Regional community engagement and sponsorship
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Adobe Experience Manager (AEM), Usercentrics (Consent Management Platform), Matomo Analytics, Cloudflare DNS and CDN, JavaScript ES Modules, Custom EON UI Web Components
Frameworks
Adobe Experience Manager
Platforms
Cloudflare, Azure (Matomo hosted)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of iframe sandboxing for embedded forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Usercentrics Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is regionally focused on energy services and community engagement.
  3. Consent management is implemented via Usercentrics.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found in the provided content.
  5. Embedded forms use third-party iframe from epilot.io for product finder.
  6. No direct email addresses or phone numbers found in the HTML content provided.
  7. Social media links are not explicitly present in the provided content.
  8. Use of modern web components and Adobe Experience Manager CMS.
  9. Matomo analytics used with heatmap and session recording features.
  10. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager CMS, leveraging modern web components and ES modules for UI. It uses Cloudflare for DNS and CDN services, enhancing performance and security. Usercentrics manages cookie consent, and Matomo provides analytics with heatmap and session recording capabilities. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. Performance is moderate, with some reliance on external scripts and embedded iframes. Technical risks include potential dependency on third-party services and the need for enhanced security header implementation. Overall, the infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly digital presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with oie-ag.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review oie-ag.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.