Skip to main content

Security report for ogilvyone.com

Ogilvy One · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ogilvy One is a globally recognized marketing and customer engagement agency specializing in creating personalized, data-driven brand relationships powered by AI and creativity. The company operates as a subsidiary of Ogilvy and serves enterprise clients with services including acquisition, service design, continuous commerce, and CRM loyalty programs. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, multimedia content, and clear branding. Technically, the site uses modern analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Application Insights, hosted behind Cloudflare DNS, ensuring good performance and monitoring capabilities. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections, though improvements are recommended in DNSSEC and security headers. Privacy compliance is partial; while a comprehensive privacy policy is linked, no cookie consent mechanism is present. Contact information is professionally presented, enhancing business credibility. Overall, the website is trustworthy and well-maintained, with minor gaps in privacy and security policy disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ogilvyone.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
25
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ogilvyone.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for ogilvyone.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ogilvy One holds a strong market position as an enterprise-level media and marketing service provider, leveraging AI and data-driven strategies to differentiate itself. Its business model focuses on delivering innovative marketing solutions and customer engagement services to large brands. The company benefits from its parent company Ogilvy's global reputation and resources. The website's content and structure indicate a focus on brand innovation and digital transformation, targeting marketing professionals and business decision-makers. The presence of regional leadership contacts and multimedia case studies suggests a well-organized global operation with a broad partnership ecosystem. Growth indicators include AI-powered service offerings and continuous commerce innovations.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protections in place. Use of Microsoft Application Insights indicates active monitoring. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and explicit security policies or incident response contacts represents gaps in security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Privacy compliance is partial due to lack of cookie consent mechanisms. The site would benefit from publishing a security policy and vulnerability disclosure to enhance transparency and incident readiness. Overall, the security posture is good but can be improved to meet higher compliance standards such as GDPR and NIS2.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ogilvy One
Description
Ogilvy One is a global marketing and customer engagement agency that creates brand, business, and customer value by designing personal, data-driven relationships at the intersection of creativity and technology, powered by AI.
Key services
Acquisition, Service Design, Continuous Commerce, CRM Loyalty
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Application Insights, jQuery Validate, Slick Carousel
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Application Insights for monitoring

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Application Insights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Application Insights
Marketing tools
Microsoft Application Insights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with rich multimedia content.
  2. No visible forms collecting personal data on the main page.
  3. Contact emails use company domain and are clearly labeled.
  4. No explicit cookie consent banner detected despite tracking scripts.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  6. WHOIS data shows domain is stable and not privacy protected, indicating transparency.
  7. Use of modern analytics and monitoring tools indicates mature digital infrastructure.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Google Tag Manager for marketing analytics and Microsoft Application Insights for performance and error monitoring. The front-end employs jQuery Validate for form validation and Slick Carousel for interactive sliders. Hosting is supported by Cloudflare DNS, providing resilience and performance benefits. The site is mobile optimized with responsive images and accessible navigation. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in security headers and privacy mechanisms are recommended to reduce risk and improve compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ogilvyone.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ogilvyone.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.