Skip to main content

Security report for oetztaltourismus.com

Ötztal Tourismus · Hospitality · Austria

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ötztal Tourismus operates a B2B information and service portal focused on tourism in the Ötztal region of Austria. The website serves as a resource for local accommodation providers and tourism professionals, offering marketing campaign details, product development updates, and service ordering options. The organization positions itself as a regional tourism authority with a medium-sized operational scale. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript libraries and integrates Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and privacy compliance, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms implemented, though explicit security policies and incident response information are not publicly available. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain reduces confidence in domain registration legitimacy, but the website content and technical setup indicate a professional and trustworthy entity. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security policies, and improving contact information visibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching oetztaltourismus.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business is positioned as a regional tourism marketing and service provider targeting accommodation owners and tourism stakeholders in the Ötztal valley. Its competitive advantage lies in localized marketing campaigns and comprehensive service offerings tailored to the tourism sector. Revenue streams likely include tourism promotion funding and service fees for marketing materials. The partnership ecosystem includes related regional tourism domains, indicating a collaborative approach to destination marketing. Growth indicators include active marketing campaigns for upcoming seasons and digital engagement via analytics tools. Operationally, the business maintains a professional online presence with consistent branding and compliance with privacy regulations.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism via Cookiebot. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the lack of published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates gaps in transparency and preparedness. Compliance with GDPR is evident through cookie consent and privacy policy availability. The business would benefit from publishing explicit security and incident response information to enhance trust and readiness. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be improved with better documentation and communication.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance visibility of contact information including dedicated security and support email addresses to improve user trust and communication.
  5. Regularly monitor domain WHOIS data and ensure registration information is accurate and publicly accessible to strengthen domain legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ötztal Tourismus
Description
Das B2B Info- & Serviceportal von Ötztal Tourismus ist deine Anlaufstelle als Vermieter:in im Tal und informiert über Marketingaktivitäten und Produktentwicklungen.
Key services
Marketing campaigns, Product development information, Prospect ordering, Guest honors
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, GSAP, Swiper, Leaflet, Rive
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking detected
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms in place
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet
  4. No explicit security or incident response policies published on the site
  5. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing
  6. No suspicious or malicious content detected
  7. WHOIS data missing, which reduces confidence in domain registration legitimacy
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front-end with libraries such as GSAP for animations, Swiper for sliders, Leaflet for maps, and Rive for interactive graphics. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tag management, while Cookiebot manages cookie consent and compliance. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and accessibility features such as skip links. Performance is moderate with module preloading and asynchronous script loading. No CMS was explicitly detected from the HTML snippet. Hosting provider details are not available. The technical stack supports a professional and user-friendly experience but could benefit from enhanced security header implementation and explicit CMS identification.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with oetztaltourismus.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review oetztaltourismus.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.