Skip to main content

Security report for oetztal.xyz

Hospitality · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.oetztal.com serves as a tourism and holiday information portal for the Ötztal region, offering a variety of activity options for summer and winter visitors. The site targets tourists and holidaymakers interested in exploring the region, providing content focused on travel planning and local attractions. The business model appears to be centered on tourism promotion and information dissemination, with partnerships to related regional tourism sites. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript libraries and tools such as Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and cookie compliance, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and professional design. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS usage and cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks visible security headers and published security policies. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain reduces trustworthiness and raises questions about domain registration transparency. Overall, the site is safe for general audiences and does not contain adult or questionable content.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching oetztal.xyz

This scan found 20 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions itself within the hospitality sector, specifically tourism for the Ötztal region. It leverages partnerships with other regional tourism domains to enhance its service offering. The business model is informational and promotional, likely generating revenue through tourism-related services or partnerships. The target customer segment includes leisure travelers and outdoor enthusiasts. The site shows signs of professional content management and marketing integration but lacks explicit business registration or contact details, which could be improved for credibility. Growth indicators include integration with multiple external platforms and marketing tools. The partnership ecosystem is robust within the regional tourism industry.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. It uses HTTPS and implements a detailed cookie consent banner compliant with GDPR principles. However, there is no evidence of advanced security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS, nor is there a published security policy or incident response contact information. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The lack of WHOIS transparency is a concern for domain legitimacy. Compliance with privacy regulations is partially addressed through Cookiebot but could be enhanced with clearer privacy policies and contact information. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not visible.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages.
  2. Add explicit contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility.
  3. Deploy security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance security posture.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact details to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS information to ensure domain registration transparency and legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Discover Ötztal and let yourself be moved by the huge variety of activity options in summer and winter. Design your holiday in Ötztal according to your wishes.
Key services
Tourism information, Holiday planning, Activity options in summer and winter
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, GSAP, Swiper, Leaflet, Rive
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent banner with granular consent options
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL https://)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Ads
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, Kognitiv
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented with detailed cookie categories.
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on the main page HTML content provided.
  4. No privacy policy or terms of service pages explicitly detected in the provided content.
  5. Use of multiple external domains for media, analytics, and marketing.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, which reduces trust score.
  7. Website content is tourism-focused and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front-end with libraries including GSAP for animations, Swiper for sliders, Leaflet for maps, and Rive for interactive graphics. Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot are integrated for analytics and cookie compliance. The site is mobile optimized and shows good SEO practices with meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with multiple external scripts that may impact load times. No CMS was explicitly detected, but the presence of WordPress-related cookies suggests possible WordPress backend usage. Hosting provider details are not available. Accessibility features are basic but present. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party services and lack of visible security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with oetztal.xyz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review oetztal.xyz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.