Skip to main content

Security report for oetztal-hub.com

Ötztal · Hospitality · Austria

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ötztal.com is a professionally designed tourism website promoting the Ötztal valley in Austria as a year-round holiday destination. It offers comprehensive information about summer and winter activities, targeting tourists and holidaymakers. The site uses modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and privacy compliance. The presence of detailed cookie consent mechanisms indicates a good level of privacy awareness. However, the absence of explicit privacy policy and terms of service pages in the analyzed content is a gap. The WHOIS data is missing or inaccessible, which raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy despite the professional appearance of the website. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, but security headers are not detected and no incident response or security policy information is found. Overall, the site is safe and trustworthy for general audiences, but domain registration status should be verified for full trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching oetztal-hub.com

This scan found 17 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website serves as a key marketing and informational platform for the Ötztal tourism sector, focusing on attracting visitors for seasonal activities. It appears to be part of a network of regional tourism sites, indicating a collaborative ecosystem. The business model is destination marketing with potential revenue streams from bookings and partnerships. The site targets leisure travelers interested in alpine experiences. The lack of direct contact information and company registration details limits transparency. The use of popular marketing and analytics tools suggests a mature digital marketing approach. Strategic partnerships with related tourism domains enhance market reach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enabled and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism that supports GDPR compliance. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts are weaknesses. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The missing WHOIS data is a significant concern from a trust perspective. Overall, the site is secure for visitors but could improve transparency and technical security controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a clear and accessible privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Provide explicit security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure transparency and legitimacy.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and cookies to minimize privacy risks and improve user consent management.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ötztal
Description
Discover Ötztal and let yourself be moved by the huge variety of activity options in summer and winter. Design your holiday in Ötztal according to your wishes.
Key services
Tourism information, Holiday planning, Activity options, Seasonal offers
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, GSAP, Swiper, Leaflet, Rive, JavaScript ES Modules
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular consent options
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Ads
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Google Ads Conversion Tracking
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, Kognitiv
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed cookie disclosures.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service links found in the provided HTML snippet.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the analyzed content.
  5. Website uses modern JavaScript modules and popular libraries for UI and tracking.
  6. WHOIS data is missing or domain may be unregistered, which is a critical concern.
  7. Website content is tourism-focused, safe, and professionally presented.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript module-based architecture with libraries such as GSAP for animations, Swiper for sliders, Leaflet for maps, and Rive for interactive graphics. Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot are integrated for analytics and cookie consent management. The CMS is likely WordPress, inferred from cookies related to Elementor and WordPress settings. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Hosting provider details are not evident. The site could benefit from enhanced security headers and improved domain registration transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with oetztal-hub.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review oetztal-hub.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.