Skip to main content

Security report for oetdoor.nl

Oetdoor · Hospitality · Netherlands

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Oetdoor is a small hospitality business based in the Netherlands offering camping, event, and meeting venue services with a Scandinavian experience theme. The website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and uses modern SEO and analytics tools such as Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, and Microsoft Clarity. The technical infrastructure is hosted by One.com with DNSSEC enabled and HTTPS enforced, indicating a good baseline security posture. However, the site lacks explicit privacy policies, terms of service, and security incident response information, which are important for compliance and trust. The cookie consent mechanism is implemented, showing awareness of GDPR requirements. Overall, the website is professionally designed, mobile optimized, and provides a good user experience with moderate tracking and advertising practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching oetdoor.nl

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention oetdoor.nl, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for oetdoor.nl right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets general consumers interested in camping and event locations in the Achterhoek region of the Netherlands. The business model focuses on hospitality services including camping and event hosting. The market position is niche and regional, with a focus on Scandinavian-themed experiences. The website content and metadata are consistent with the business profile and domain registration data. The presence of a German language domain suggests an intent to serve multiple language markets. No major certifications or trust badges are visible, indicating a small to medium scale operation. The company uses standard digital marketing and analytics tools to support growth and customer engagement.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and has DNSSEC enabled, which are strong indicators of secure domain and transport layer security. It uses reCAPTCHA v3 to protect forms from spam and bots. However, there is no visible security policy, incident response contact, or vulnerability disclosure mechanism such as security.txt. The site uses multiple third-party scripts including Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity, which require ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Cookie consent is implemented, but privacy policy details are missing, which is a compliance gap. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in transparency and incident readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add a security policy page and incident response contact information to enhance security transparency.
  3. Implement a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve inclusivity and compliance with standards.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Oetdoor
Description
Camping en event en vergader locatie met kampvuurtjes en unieke binnen locaties. Scandinavië experience in de Achterhoek
Key services
Camping, Event location, Meeting venue
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, reCAPTCHA v3, FontAwesome
Frameworks
WordPress Gutenberg
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • DNSSEC enabled
  • Use of reCAPTCHA v3
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based hospitality and event location site.
  2. Uses modern SEO and analytics tools.
  3. Cookie consent banner present indicating GDPR awareness.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found.
  5. No visible security or incident response policies.
  6. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  7. Domain is active, DNSSEC enabled, and registered with a reputable registrar.
  8. Mobile optimized with good design and navigation.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Gutenberg editor and WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities. It leverages popular plugins such as Yoast SEO for search engine optimization and Contact Form 7 for form management. The tech stack includes jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and reCAPTCHA v3 for analytics and security. Hosting is provided by One.com with DNSSEC enabled, indicating a secure DNS setup. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and uses Google Fonts and FontAwesome for styling and icons. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and use of caching implied. Some inline CSS and custom styles are present, indicating customization. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and security documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with oetdoor.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review oetdoor.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.