Skip to main content

Security report for odiens.com

Odiens · Media · France

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 3 other checks.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Odiens is a French webmarketing and media agency with offices in Nantes, Paris, and Lille. The company offers a comprehensive range of digital marketing services including SEO, SEA, social media management, media planning, programmatic advertising, web analytics, and AI-driven automation solutions. Positioned as a hybrid agency combining digital and traditional media expertise, Odiens targets businesses seeking to enhance their online visibility and conversion performance. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and rich in relevant content, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and performance optimizations, including Gravity Forms for data collection and Matomo for analytics. Security measures include HTTPS, Google reCAPTCHA on forms, and GDPR-compliant consent mechanisms. However, some security headers are missing, and WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, which slightly reduces trust. Overall, the site demonstrates a strong security posture and compliance with privacy regulations, supporting its credibility as a professional agency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  5. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching odiens.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
65
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
68
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Odiens operates in the media sector, focusing on webmarketing and traditional media services. Its business model revolves around consulting and executing digital marketing strategies for clients across various industries. The agency leverages certifications such as Google Partner and Pinterest Media Buyer to establish market credibility. Its parent company is Copylot, indicating a broader corporate structure. The target customers are businesses in France looking for integrated marketing solutions. The website content and structure suggest a medium-sized agency with a solid market position and growth orientation. The presence of multiple contact forms and newsletter subscriptions indicates active lead generation and client engagement strategies.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from spam, and includes GDPR-compliant consent checkboxes. While some recommended security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not explicitly detected, the overall security posture is good. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The use of Matomo analytics suggests a preference for privacy-conscious tracking. The lack of a published security policy or incident response information is a minor gap. The WHOIS data absence is a concern but likely due to privacy protection rather than malicious intent.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options HTTP headers to enhance security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance WHOIS transparency if possible, or provide clear justification for privacy protection to reassure stakeholders.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Odiens
Description
Agence spécialisée en webmarketing et media, ODIENS vous accompagne pour optimiser votre SEO, déployez des campagnes SEA, booster vos conversions.
Key services
SEO optimization, SEA campaigns, Social media management, Media planning, Programmatic advertising, Web analytics, Digital strategy, Training, Automation with AI
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Gravity Forms, jQuery, Google reCAPTCHA, Matomo Analytics, Axeptio (cookie consent), WP Rocket (performance optimization)
Frameworks
Gravity Forms, WP Rocket
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • GDPR consent on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Google reCAPTCHA, Matomo Analytics, Axeptio cookie consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Professional and comprehensive webmarketing and media agency site
  3. Multiple contact forms with GDPR consent and CAPTCHA
  4. Strong SEO and social media integration
  5. Use of modern web technologies and performance optimizations
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, possibly due to privacy protection or domain not registered under queried WHOIS server
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Gravity Forms, Google reCAPTCHA, Matomo analytics, and WP Rocket for performance optimization. The site uses minified CSS and JavaScript, lazy loading for images, and responsive design techniques ensuring excellent mobile optimization. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags, Open Graph data, and JSON-LD structured data. Accessibility is good with ARIA roles and labels on forms. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. Performance appears fast with asynchronous script loading and preconnect hints. The site integrates third-party services for analytics and cookie consent, balancing functionality and privacy.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with odiens.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review odiens.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.