Skip to main content

Security report for oddspedia.com

Oddspedia · Media · United States

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Oddspedia is a sports media platform established in 2013, providing live scores, betting odds comparison, sports news, and statistics to sports fans and bettors. The company positions itself as a leading source for sports information and betting data, targeting a global audience interested in sports and betting markets. The business operates primarily in the media sector with a medium-sized footprint and is based in the United States. Technically, the website uses modern frontend frameworks such as Vue.js and Nuxt.js, hosted with Cloudflare DNS services, delivering a good user experience with mobile optimization and SEO best practices. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain protection statuses set, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are recommended for enhancement. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which should be addressed to meet GDPR and other regulations. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences, with clear contact information and social media presence supporting business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching oddspedia.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention oddspedia.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1,168
Employees
0
Customers
1,168
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
13%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for oddspedia.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Oddspedia operates in the competitive sports media and betting information market, leveraging live data feeds and odds comparison to attract sports enthusiasts and bettors. Its business model likely includes affiliate marketing with bookmakers, advertising, and possibly premium data services. The company benefits from a well-established domain since 2013, consistent branding, and a presence on major social media platforms, enhancing its market reach. The lack of explicit privacy and terms policies may pose compliance risks but does not detract from its operational maturity. The company’s physical presence in New York City and transparent contact details support its legitimacy and customer trust. Strategic partnerships or subsidiaries were not identified in the provided data.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enforced and domain status flags preventing unauthorized domain changes. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces its defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies are publicly available, which limits transparency in security management. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The security score reflects these strengths and gaps, recommending improvements in DNS security and HTTP headers to enhance protection against common web threats.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and cache poisoning attacks.
  2. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve browser security.
  4. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerable components are used.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Oddspedia
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Oddspedia
Description
Since 2013 Oddspedia has been your definitive #1 source for sports! Get fast live scores, check the latest betting odds, news and stats on your favorite teams and leagues.
Key services
live scores, betting odds comparison, sports news, statistics
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Vue.js, Nuxt.js, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Vue.js, Nuxt.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientDeleteProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is sports-focused with live scores and betting odds comparison.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided HTML content.
  3. Contact information includes a support email and a physical address in New York City.
  4. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
  5. Modern frontend technologies used (Vue.js, Nuxt.js).
  6. DNSSEC not enabled, which is a security improvement opportunity.
  7. No visible security headers in the provided data; recommend adding.
  8. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter (X), and YouTube.
  9. No signs of adult or NSFW content; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern JavaScript frameworks Vue.js and Nuxt.js, indicating a contemporary and maintainable frontend architecture. Hosting utilizes Cloudflare DNS services, providing reliable DNS resolution but lacks DNSSEC for enhanced security. The site includes multiple preloaded fonts and optimized images, suggesting attention to performance and user experience. SEO is supported by comprehensive meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format, improving search engine visibility. Accessibility and mobile optimization are rated good, though no explicit accessibility features were identified in the truncated HTML. The absence of CMS detection suggests a custom or headless CMS approach. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a robust and scalable platform but can benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy compliance improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with oddspedia.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review oddspedia.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.